The significance of May 27th

One of the tragedies of the general election campaign was the death of John Boakes, UKIP candidate for Thirsk & Malton. As a result polling in the general election there has been delayed until May 27th.

These sorts of delayed polls happen thankfully rarely and are not usually of wider political significance. However, if the election result is as close as the polls suggest it will be, May 27th could turn into one of the first significant political tests for whoever is Prime Minster and whatever arrangements they’ve made (or not made) to get that post.

The notional result in 2005 was:

Conservatives 52%
Labour 23%
Liberal Democrat 19%

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in General Election.


  • Typical Liberal.

    Looking at the next election before this one’s finished!!

  • Terry Gilbert 8th May '10 - 7:56am

    Lib Dem gain from Con! But only if we’re careful in the negotiations and get our narrative right (and out there, bloggers!) on the outcome.

  • Anna Berent 8th May '10 - 1:45pm

    Hate the idea of our joining up with the Tories, but if, and only if, we can get a promise of a bill for proportional representation in the queen’s speech, would swallow hard and go with it.

  • jean basson 9th May '10 - 1:09pm

    I vote lib dem because I agree mostly with their ethos and their aims, but I do not and will not vote lib dem in future if they do a deal with the conservatives. It would be a disaster for the party’s future. The only way to get a future is for proportional representation and the only way possible to get that is from a deal with the labour party.

  • I am concerned that we are still talking to the conservatives, I don’t trust them. Please don’t forget your members we are on the whole opposed to these talks.

  • Any deal without PR would be truly disastrous. Coalitions only work under PR, not under FPTP.

  • Victor Whitworth 10th May '10 - 8:15am

    Politics is the art of the possible. Let us trust our negotiators.

  • Grattan Endicott 10th May '10 - 10:06am

    I am impressed by those who are saying a short term deal with Labour is the best choice. It should be possible to get some change in the voting system in that way. Any move towards a more proportional system before there is another election is desirable.

  • Would be interesting to see how the Lib Dems fight the Tories if they are in coalition at the same time.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Joe Bourke
    Sovereign wealth funds have been mooted by both Labour ...
  • Steve Trevethan
    What does “balance the budget” mean in practical reality?...
  • Mick Taylor
    @MohammedAmin. Strange then that our sister party in Luxembourg campaigned and won on radical policies like legalising cannabis, free public transport and legal...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Michael BG, "Are you suggesting that companies pay sick leave for long periods of time?" No. It would only apply to those on the JG scheme. ...
  • Peter Martin
    "Establish a Sovereign Wealth Fund" ??? Why would you want to do this? The reason for having them is to export capital which in turn keeps the ...