Memo to the media: Clegg was first on Labour’s stealth tax, as Tories play catch-up

Excuse me, while I discard my customery mode of politness, and begin to vent …

[vent] What is it with the media, and their inability to report the Lib Dems or our policies or statements?

The political news this morning has been dominated by a ‘Stealth tax’ dispute … PoliticsHome informs us that, ‘The Conservatives have accused the government of a effectively creating an additional tax on 30 million people by freezing personal allowances on income tax, as part of yesterday’s Budget.’

Except it took the Tories a day to cotton on to that story. The chap who spotted Labour’s tax ruse on the spot was not David Cameron, but Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg. I’ve even copied and pasted, below, an excerpt from the Hansard transcript of his budget reponse delivered yesterday afternoon.

Has Nick been given any credit for this? No. Perhaps part of the reason is because the BBC refused to broadcast Nick’s budget response yesterday, cutting instead to an oh-so-important talking heads studio discussion instead.

The same thing happend in 2007, after all, when then Lib Dem leader Ming Campbell immediately spotted the ticking time-bomb which was Gordon Brown’s abolition of the 10p tax rate.

Maybe if the media gave the Lib Dems a break they’d actually learn some of this stuff on the day, rather than have to wait for the Tories to play catch-up later?

[/vent]

From Nick Clegg’s budget response, 24 March 2010:

Finally, on tax, the other gross disappointment in this Budget was the failure to make our tax system fair. Under Labour, the bottom 10 per cent. pay a staggering 48 per cent. of their income in tax, while the richest pay 34 per cent. The Chancellor took pride in saying today that he would make no big announcements on tax. How can he look at a system such as that and say, “Let’s have more of the same”? Indeed, his comments seemed to suggest a freeze in income tax rates, which would, if earnings rise, once again hit the poorest hardest. So much for fairness under Labour. How can he happily accept that it is okay for a banker in the City of London to pay a far lower rate of tax on their capital gains than their cleaner does on their wages? So much for fairness under Labour.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Phil Beesley
    Lib Dems have a problem understanding the differences between production and consumption of fossil fuel. Starting with simple ideas, the UK will consume foss...
  • John Marriott
    @David Gray No. You should not make any comments and hide behind a pseudonym. Are you listening ‘Jeff’, ‘Marco’,‘Nonconformistradical’, ‘Martin...
  • Roland
    There is the obvious solution... Free school dinners for all....
  • Peter
    Would Lib Dems ban the import of oil? The use of oil? Oil production? Or complain but continue to use the benefits of oil?...
  • matt
    @Barry & David Many thanks and much appreciated....