News from the daily sheets

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Live Twitter Stream | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home

George Crozier, from the Political Intelligence and Communication Section wrote last night in a comment that a little difficulty was being had updating the party website from Liverpool, and gave the following information about the weekend:

The two emergency motions which will be debated between 16.25 and 16.55 on Saturday (tomorrow) are on Extraordinary Rendition and Sustainable Banking.The emergency motion that will be debated at 9am on Sunday morning is on Gaza. It is proposed by Hackney Lib Dems and it condemns both terrorist acts aimed at Israeli civilian targets and disproportionate use of force by the Israeli Defence Forces.

Ed Davey will propose the motion on rendition, which calls for a full independent inquiry into British involvement with the US practice of rendition, including use of Diego Garcia for flights.

Vince Cable will sum up on the banking motion, which notes the nationalisation of Northern Rock and makes a number of proposals, including a new regulatory regime for banking and a new Deposit Protection Scheme paid for by banks to provide 100% cover for personal deposits of up to £50,000.

Two amendments to the Special Educational Needs motion have been accepted for debate on Saturday morning. One, from the East Lothian party, stresses the importance of support during transition from school to adult services. The other, from the Canterbury party, proposes funding a dedicated pool of specialist teachers available to schools where the school doesn’t have the capacity to cope with a child with special needs.

Three amendments have been accepted for debate on the health paper, for debate on Saturday afternoon. The first, from Camden Lib Dems, proposes health boards should be made up of two-thirds directly elected members, and one third local authority councillors.

The second proposed amendment to the health motion will be proposed by Steve Hitchins, from Islington. It proposes deleting the part of the motion that proposes setting up elected health boards, and instead transferring the governance role for primary health care from PCTs to local authorities (those which already have social services responsibilities).

Thr third proposed amendment to the health motion is from the Ludlow party. It sets down some criteria that should be applied by local health boards to the procurement of private sector health provision, to ensure private sector procurement does not destabilise local NHS provision.

The urgent issue debate on Sunday morning – the one which does not have a motion or a vote – will be on rising energy prices. It will be introduced by Duncan Hames, PPC for Chippenham.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Conference.

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Martin 16th Dec - 1:38pm
    Devolution, at its worst, is simply handing out the responsibility but with the power. It's happening in Wales now. There will be no point complaining...
  • User AvatarSue Sutherland 16th Dec - 1:35pm
    One of the problems we have with regard to university education is that academic intelligence is the only intelligence that is valued with the result...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 16th Dec - 1:19pm
    A Federal solution is a possible answer. Not ‘balkanisation’ as (far from) ‘Innocent Bystander’ envisages. It could go something like this: A Federal Parliament in...
  • User AvatarFiona 16th Dec - 1:10pm
    I had meant to include in my comment something about further devolution including an adapted Barnet type formula. There already exists fiscal transfer across the...
  • User AvatarInnocent Bystander 16th Dec - 12:33pm
    More English devolution nonsense. Firstly the English will never accept the Balkanisation and destruction of England and secondly the author never mentions the key word...
  • User Avatarexpats 16th Dec - 11:43am
    iona 15th Dec '18 - 4:34pm.............75% going to university is neither realistic, nor desirable IMO. Switch ‘going to university.......... Most of the young population going...