Next week in the Lords: 13-16 June… God bless Her Majesty!

House of Lords chamberAfter the pomp of the Queen’s Speech, comes the dissection of its content. Of course, that’s not all that gets done, so let’s dive into the week ahead…

Monday sees the debate on elements of the Speech relating to business, economy, local government and transport, whilst crossbench peer, Baroness Young of Hornsey has a particularly salient oral question, seeking a view on how UK clothing sector retailers might ensure that people working throughout their supply chains enjoy safe and secure working conditions in light of the Rana Plaza disaster.

On Tuesday, Kate Parminter has an oral question on the Government’s stance on a levy on single use plastic bags in England, before debate returns to the Speech, with agriculture, culture, education, energy, health and welfare under the spotlight.

Meanwhile, not getting the attention it deserves as usual, the Economic Affairs Select Committee will asking, “Is a new approach needed towards taxing corporations in a global economy?” The simple answer is yes. The long answer is rather more complex, I fear…

The Queen’s Speech is finally dispatched on Wednesday with defence, foreign and commonwealth affairs and international development, and one hopes for pressure on the 0.7% of GDP on international development target.

Finally, Thursday is rich with Liberal Democrat content, with oral questions on funding available to enable self-excluded severely bullied children to return to education from Sal Brinton and on Government proposals for reform of the EU at the forthcoming meeting of the European Council from Hugh Dykes. This will be followed by a debate on the contribution of outdoor activities to the UK economy and to the health and wellbeing of the population, to be opened by Tony Greaves.

And with a weekend to come, a nice long walk seems quite inviting…

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • John Waller
    On 3 March 2022 AOL said Zelensky called for direct negotiations with Putin. On 11 March 2022 Pope Francis offered to Putin to mediate. Putin said “not no...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Martin, As you know full employment is not defined as 0% unemployment for the reasons you gave. In the past it was defined as 2.5% unemployment. You...
  • Nigel Quinton
    To Tom Harney, while I suspect we do have slightly more influence than you suggest still, I agree it is minimal. What we can do, and should do immediately, is h...
  • Simon R
    @Katharine: Hard to explain stuff in 250 words but: Yes, ensuring everyone has a reasonable standard of living requires two things: Primarily you to make sure t...
  • Simon R
    @Peter Davies: Totally agree about the definition of poverty. When I talk about poverty, I generally mean the intuitive sense of people struggling to buy necess...