Nick Clegg returns to income tax

Later this morning, Nick Clegg will be giving a speech to the Resolution Foundation (word cloud here) in which, after recent talk about wealth taxes, he is returning to the topic of income tax cuts. More specifically, speeding up the progress towards a basic income tax allowance of £10,000 whilst keeping the 50p rate.

This is of course closely linked to wealth taxes as they are a way to raise the funds to pay for the income tax cuts.

Aside from the numbers adding up – a very important consideration for tax policy – it also has the merit of fitting well with what the public wants from political parties (a commitment to fairness). Moreover, it is rather a political win-win: the idea of income tax cuts attracts Conservatives enough that it may happen, but the Tory-repelling wealth tax part means it is clearly seen as a Liberal Democrat package.

The importance being attached to this message by the party is shown by the speech not only being heavily pre-briefed to the media (resulting in, for example, the lead headline on the Daily Telegraph’s front page: Nick Clegg: speed up the tax cuts) but also a pre-speech email to party members from Vince Cable:

As families face more of a squeeze, today Liberal Democrats are arguing for greater tax cuts for hard working people.

Between now and the Budget, Nick and Danny and I will be arguing for faster tax cuts, giving you a reward for hard work. And Nick will be setting out our case in a speech today.

Given the budget constraint we have to raise money for the tax cut elsewhere and have plans to raise an equivalent amount from the wealthiest taxpayers.

At the last election the Liberal Democrats promised to raise the personal allowance for ordinary taxpayers to £10,000. I am proud that the Coalition has committed to doing so over the course of this Parliament.

For millions of ordinary hard working people, that means paying £700 less in income tax each year. Low earners, mostly women will benefit from being lifted out of tax altogether.

But times are tough and quite simply, Liberal Democrats in Government want to help families who are currently being squeezed by moving more quickly.

Whether it’s targeting an extra £7bn from tax evaders and avoiders, taking an extra £2.5bn every year from the banks in a balance sheet tax, or the announcement I made on Monday to curb the excesses of executive pay, this Coalition is taking important steps to deliver a fairer economy.

And we have already made a big difference, click here to see how.

We are building a new economy, one that benefits the whole country, not just bankers in the City of London. Making the tax system fairer is crucial to that. This is a huge task that will make Britain a fairer and more liberal country for generations to come.

 A footnote for political vocabulary fans: “alarm clock Britain” is set to make a return in today’s speech.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • After everything that’s been said over the last few days, is it really a priority to speed up tax cuts for everyone paying the basic rate of income tax – which, as Lord Ashdown pointed out, includes some couples earning about £80,000 between them? Can the government really not figure out a way of directing tax cuts towards those whose need is greatest? (Or at least can they refrain from telling us “there is no money” when they next cut benefits.)

  • Stuart Mitchell 26th Jan '12 - 11:12am

    “Low earners, mostly women will benefit from being lifted out of tax altogether.”

    Of course many women have already been “lifted out of tax altogether” by virtue of the fact that low-paid women have borne the brunt of public sector job cuts.

    Many of those who still cling to their jobs are already earning less than the current allowance so will get no benefit whatsoever from a further increase.

    As usual, it’s the people at the very bottom who are ignored while those in the middle are pandered to. Anybody would think middle class people are statistically more likely to vote or something.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 19th Oct - 1:44pm
    The British Empire (thank goodness) slipped away many years ago with all the cruelty and exploitation that went with it. I do not lament its...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 19th Oct - 1:41pm
    BBC Radio 4 World at One on 19/10/2017 included a contribution from David Steel. He said that the 1967 Act is out of date and...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 19th Oct - 1:10pm
    This is not a question of policy, I think, Catherine, though thank you for your ideas. It seems to me a question of resources, and...
  • User AvatarPalehorse 19th Oct - 1:03pm
    David, Thank you for replying but I wasn't asking for your bank password just an opinion as to where you thought the "Great British Recovery"...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 19th Oct - 12:32pm
    @ Palehorse Flattering of you to describe Katherine and myself as "sensible types", but sorry, I'm afraid I must decline your invitation. It might be...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 19th Oct - 12:26pm
    Oh Yes and Mick Bates AM's idiosyncrasies in 2011. Truly a double disaster. But Matt is also right, the Welsh do have to answer that...