Nick Clegg – working partner; working parent

The Independent today features a relationship-focused interview with Nick Clegg. It looks mainly at two areas for balance: work/family and his working partnership with David Cameron:

Mr Clegg… insists he is determined to keep family life and government work as separate as humanly possible.

In this aim he has found an ally in the Prime Minister, who is also the father of small children. Both agreed to change the timing of a cabinet meeting to fit in with the school run. “I try – I haven’t entirely succeeded yet – as much as I can to take the kids to school,” he says before adding: “To walk them to school.”

“In a sense I’m very lucky because David Cameron has young children. We agreed the other day we were going to slightly delay the start of the cabinet meeting to allow us both to take our children to school, which is a reflection – if any was needed – of the fact that we are both of the same generation in this new politics.” He adds that he is “very rigid in saying ‘no’ to endless dinner invitations, to try to make sure I’m back home regularly to put the kids to bed”.

And like so many working parents who have to do the odd bit of catching up once those kids are in bed, Nick, we learn, was on the phone to Danny Alexander at midnight on Sunday, following the weekend’s dramatic events.

On communicating with David Cameron, his “partner in government”:

We speak every day, if not several times a day – it’s a very strong working partnership. We have each other’s mobiles, BlackBerries, emails.

We work quickly – we are able to arrive at difficult decisions quickly. We understand the constraints we are both working under and we’re very pragmatic and workmanlike about the fact our partnership is absolutely essential in making sure the coalition works.

Nick Clegg won’t get any questions at the first Prime Minister’s Questions of the new Parliament later today, but he refers to the “architectural antagonism of the chamber” and the “yah-boo across the despatch box.”

However, he insists:

I am very keen the Liberal Democrat voice should continue to be heard in Parliament and it will be.

Just how this will be achieved isn’t quite yet understood, but many of us are already watching to see what kind of start is made in this new partnership in government.

Read the full interview here.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Stuart Mitchell 2nd Jun '10 - 12:24pm

    “We agreed the other day we were going to slightly delay the start of the cabinet meeting to allow us both to take our children to school, which is a reflection – if any was needed – of the fact that we are both of the same generation in this new politics.”

    Every PM since 1997 has had young children. There’s nothing “new” about it.

  • OhNoNotAgain 2nd Jun '10 - 9:22pm

    Quite! And its very nauseating for working mothers and fathers who can’t alter the routines of the companies they work for. Grow up this isn’t being family friendly – you have to give these rights to other people and then you are family friendly.

  • Andrea Gill 2nd Jun '10 - 9:33pm

    @OhNoNotAgain – Isn’t more flexible working patterns part of the coalition agenda?

  • Oh really! Take academy school. There will be no consultation with parents before a school opts out with the right to be able to set different term dates, school hours and admission policies. Very family friendly – mums will be running around like crazy hens. I am afraid you lib dems have got into bed with some strange bed fellows – this is not going to go down a treat with parents – good luck!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDan M-B 28th Jan - 11:24pm
    I was polled. The question was: "Imagine that these were the only three candidates, but Layla Moran and Daisy Cooper weren't competitive. In this scenario,...
  • User AvatarHywel 28th Jan - 11:23pm
    "it was under Nick Clegg’s watch that we managed not only to fail to win several seats from Labour that should have been easy wins...
  • User AvatarYousuf Farah 28th Jan - 11:00pm
    Since the UK is leaving the EU, decoupling and isolating, as someone else eloquently put it in this thread, would it not make sense to...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 28th Jan - 10:58pm
    Peter Martin It’s all nonsense of course. In any case, what makes you think Lib Dems are in any position to lecture anyone on “cosy...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 28th Jan - 10:50pm
    Peter Martin The last time I checked, London was in the South of England and Labour always has good representation there. That proves my point....
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 28th Jan - 10:50pm
    And thank you very much, Katharine. I'd only add that the stats for all UK Foodbanks show a 22% increase in demand over the last...