Nick unveils his Plan for Reform on MPs’ expenses

Earlier today LDV reported on The Times’s splash that Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg would be proposing that MPs should be forced to sell their second homes and return most of the profits to the taxpayer. In fact, his plans for reform of MPs’ expenses is far more far-reaching than that, and are published in full over at nickclegg.com, and covered here on the BBC.

Here’s Nick’s reasoning behind his Plan for Reform:

MPs’ Expenses, My Plan for Reform – Nick Clegg, Leader of the Liberal Democrats

The ongoing controversy over the expenses system is having a hugely damaging effect on public confidence in MPs and politics. The behaviour of a small minority of politicians has played a major role in this collapse in confidence, but there has also been a collective failure to agree on a system that is seen as fair and transparent.

In recent years MPs from both the Labour and Conservative parties have voted against proposals made by the Members Estimates Committee to toughen the expenses regime, or have attempted to block Freedom of Information regulation that would see MPs’ expenses subjected to public scrutiny.

It is clear that the status quo cannot now continue. That is why we need talks between the three party leaders to create a swift resolution and introduce a set of rules that would enable MPs to do their jobs and enjoy public confidence. It is important that the system is fixed as soon as possible, rather than waiting for a committee to report in five or six months’ time.

Such a system should be based on clear principles:

* Taxpayers have a right to know how their money is being spent
* All expenses have to be justified on the basis of enabling MPs to do their job
* Reform should not increase, and should ideally reduce, the total cost of politics to the taxpayer.

Nick’s Plan for Reform has earned praise on Paul Staines’ Guido Fawkes blog (“he has come up with some good reform proposals that most voters would welcome”) and rattled ConservativeHome.com: “It is vital that the Conservative leadership do not allow Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats to lead on this issue and use it as a campaign weapon against Conservative candidates.”

What’s even more vital than tribal point-scoring is that reform happens – for the sake of all political parties and the democratic process.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Has ever Lib Dem MP signed up to the proposals?

    If so, let’s get shouting from the rooftops!!!

  • Mark Wright 10th Apr '09 - 4:45pm

    This is great news – a serious and radical proposal. I have been campaigning for some time for a total rebuild of the expenses system:
    http://campaigns.libdems.org.uk/expenses_reform

    PS Hi Jon – good to see you here! 😉

  • David Morton 10th Apr '09 - 6:55pm

    To ask the two most Obvious questions.

    1. have all 63 MP’s signed upto this ? If not even a couple saying No will derail the whole thing.

    2. What would be really radical and doubtless painful would be to impliment it unilaterally. I really do think a fairly dark “bugger the lot of them” mood is developing and a plan however good will not break through with out a bit of extra credibility. Unilateral implimentation would be one such extra.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    There's a lot of knee jerk reaction to the idea of "Tory-lite". I understand it but I think it is the wrong way to think about the issue. There will always ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ John Hills, Yes, good points! Your calculator is probably OK after all! :-)...
  • John Ralph Tristan W
    " the UK’s general election saw the end of fourteen years of calamitous Conservative governance". No it didn't. The first Parliament of the 14 years was a...
  • John Hills
    @David Rogers and @Peter Martin I did worry for a moment about my arithmetic! But if Tories are on 121 and the Lib Dems take the 20 seats that we are currently ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ David Rogers, You are quite right with your arithmetic and it is a pity that John Hills' calculator might have been misfunctioning, but his point about nee...