One week on, and not a peep from Danny

Cast your minds back to 1st April, and the G20 protests in London. You may recall two trenchant articles by The Times’s Daniel Finkelstein savaging four senior Lib Dems – Baroness Williams, Simon Hughes, Chris Huhne and David Howarth – for acting as legal observers monitoring the policing of the climate camp protest timed to coincide with the G20 summit.

Let me refresh your memories. Danny accused this “extraordinary delegation” of Lib Dems of an “extraordinary insult” to the police, and demanded Nick Clegg use Danny’s blog to denounce or renounce the activities of his colleagues.

Lib Dem Voice took Danny to task for ignoring serious disquiet about previous policing of protests on three occasions last week, here, here and here. So, too, did the vast majority of the 71 comments left on the Comment Central blog.

Danny’s now-not-so-trenchant response? Total silence.

Clearly he’s been too busy reading up how to win $1m spotting ghosts, musing how Obama’s car got to the UK, reprinting lists of irrational people, and other such earth-shattering stories.

On Tuesday the news broke of the Guardian video showing a police officer launching a vicious and unprovoked attack on a non-protesting G20 bystander, Ian Tomlinson, who subsequently died of a heart attack. Did Comment Centrral – Danny’s “rolling guide to opinion on the web” – find anything in this shocking story worth commenting on? Not so far.

Total silence.


So come on, Danny, why not break your G20 silence? Surely you owe your readers an explanation? And Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems an apology. (Don’t worry, we won’t hold our breaths).

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Doesn’t this rather pale in comparison to someone’s death? Sure, Danny shouldn’t have said what he did, and he was proved wrong, but dragging this on seems a bit insensitive when the IPCC are investigating Mr Tomlinson’s death, especially when compared to the considerate coverage made by LDV on this matter.

  • But given that Finkelstein is criticising scrutiny of the same police tactics that may have contributed to Mr. Tomlinson’s death, isn’t there a legitimate question of whether we should unthinkingly back the police or constantly guard against abuse of the substantial power our society has delegated to them?

    This isn’t about scoring points on a Times columnist; it’s a serious debate about whether authority and state power should always be questioned and scrutinised to discuss whether they are reasonable and proportional to the alternative harm.

    As a conservative-in-liberal-clothing Danny Finkelstein should be called out on this one.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

    No recent comment found.