Nine out of ten people spied on by local authorities are innocent

From today’s Daily Mail, following up the story about the widespread using of snooping powers by councils (as covered yesterday by Home Office Watch):

Nine in ten of 10,000 spied on by councils using anti-terrorism powers are innocent
The revelation intensified the controversy over local councils using anti-terror powers to spy on those suspected of ‘crimes’ such as putting their bins out on the wrong day.

The legislation, which allows secret filming and even the trailing of suspects by undercover officials, has been used by councils at least 10,333 times over the past five years…

Others targeted under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) have included those suspected of littering or letting a dog foul the footpath.

But details obtained through Freedom of Information laws reveal that only 9 per cent of authorisations have led to a successful prosecution, caution or fixed-penalty notice

In the remaining 91 per cent of cases, those investigated were found to have done no wrong.

Liberal Democrat local government spokesman Julia Goldsworthy, who obtained the figures, said: ‘This Government has seen civil liberties as little more than a temporary inconvenience.’

It seems to me the figures are signficant for two particular reasons. First, they provide an important pragmatic argument which complements principled arguments over civil rights. As Lynne Featherstone has often put it: the government should be spending our money trying to catch the guilty rather than keeping tabs on the innocent. Second, as the extent of coverage the Mail has been giving this story (not just today) shows, this angle is particularly attractive to a wider audience who traditional arguments over civil liberties often don’t reach.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 29th May - 10:39am
    If anyone finds the above a bit too serious, I strongly recommend the brilliant Durham Dash song on youtube from Lockie Chapman and his lockdowned...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 29th May - 10:16am
    @ expats, There's no way the app will know if you've actually touched. All it can calculate is the distance between the two mobile phones....
  • User Avatarexpats 29th May - 9:55am
    Richard Underhill 29th May '20 - 8:45am...“Sources” are saying that “Dominic Cummings will resign in 6 months time”.... Now there's a surprise. It's just another...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 29th May - 8:45am
    24th May '20 - 5:39pm "Sources" are saying that "Dominic Cummings will resign in 6 months time". Not a moment too soon. Awaiting this event,...
  • User AvatarDavid McDowall 29th May - 8:40am
    I agree with Manfarang we should remember UN General Assembly (partition) Resolution 181 of 1947. It was a recommendation not a decree, the Security Council...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 29th May - 8:26am
    'the Lib Dems’ new members’ complaints procedure ' I know how I read this at first. Perhaps you mean 'the Lib Dems’ new complaints procedure...