No, Christopher Wren and Isaac Newton were not great MPs

Matthew Engel in today’s Financial Times has a pop at our current MPs, saying:

The House of Commons used to be filled with men of renown. Sir Christopher Wren was an MP. So was Sir Isaac Newton – and John Stuart Mill.

It’s an easy jibe to make – ‘MPs aren’t as good as they used to be’ – but his examples seem to me to be rather badly chosen. John Stuart Mill, I’ll grant you, was a man of renown and an admirable, hard-working MP who used Parliament to promote the causes he believed in.

But Isaac Newton? He barely contributed to Parliament and indeed the most common account of his Parliamentary work is that he only spoke the once – asking for a window to be closed.

And Christopher Wren? Although he was more active in Parliament, he hasn’t left behind evidence of any real achievements and his elections were dogged by controversy, with Parliament twice voting to unseat him in favour of defeated candidates.

I don’t think either of them would be getting plaudits if there were MPs now, and nor did they get plaudits for their performance as MPs at the time.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Nicholas James 16th May '09 - 12:41pm

    True, but isn’t the point that Matthew Engel makes is that people of renown actually WANTED to become MPs. Parliament was a place which attracted the very best and most acclaimed in any field – however they fulfilled their duties – and should be again.

  • Surely they are ‘people of renown’ because of how we view their achievments through the lens of history. At the time they wanted to become MPs because that was what gentlemen of their class did and it opened the way to more patronage oppertunities.

  • Sadly it’s not online, but Mr Engel got involved in a bit of a row with one of our local papers this week, over comments about a particular town in a travel book he’s written.

    He said this town was “third on [his] list of Britain’s vilest towns” (seizing in brackets the chance to run down two others), explaining:

    “The hotel was dire, the staff surly and ugly, and the breakfast inedible. Through the long May evening, the streets were full of pre-adolescent children, feral yet obese.”

    All the now traditional local outrage has been expressed, but I am struck less by unkindness or inaccuracy (there is a lot of the former and presumably at least some of the latter) than by the sheer laziness of writing such things…presumably while having some kind of travel-authorish tantrum. Laziness seems to be an emerging theme.

    Responding to being challenged on the town comments he seems to get more feeble by the minute:

    “I might have been unlucky that weekend…It can depend an awful lot on the circumstances…I suppose I’m one of these people who get cross and say what they think.” (save only that he doesn’t seem to have said anything at the time, just published most of a year later. Probably rightly, even if dishonestly, he claims to be unable to remember where he stayed.)

    He then excuses all this by adding that as a nation, “we don’t complain enough”. Is he serious?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarfrankie 22nd Sep - 11:13am
    Jayne, You might be right if Jeremey wasn't a committed Brexiteer ( sorry Lexiteer ) but he is. So you are faced with the devil...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 22nd Sep - 10:26am
    @ Frankie, I believe that the foremost concern for many, is removing Boris Johnson and his ilk from office. This will require tactical voting on...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 22nd Sep - 10:11am
    "His fate is to be known as the worst PM ever, his only hope is Depeffle is worse, but being the second worst is no...
  • User Avatarfrankie 22nd Sep - 9:20am
    You are being kind, the badly thought out and run referendum didn't badly damage Cameron's reputation, it totally trashed it. He will go down in...
  • User Avatarfrankie 22nd Sep - 9:15am
    "Labour must come clean about their Brexit plan – Lib Dems" But,but they have any number of plans depending upon what you believe. They have...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 22nd Sep - 8:00am
    Dennis, I think you are missing Paul's point, which is the whole point about targeting. Yes there was an increase in our vote and a...
Thu 10th Oct 2019