Observer: Britain “poised to open door” to refugee children

For months now, there have been repeated calls for the UK to take 3000 unaccompanied child refugees who have fled the Syrian conflict.

Tim Farron has been pressing the Government to do so, going as far as tabling a Bill in Parliament. Most of the opposition parties in Parliament and its International Development Committee are in favour.

Tomorrow’s Observer suggests that action may soon be forthcoming:

Amid growing expectation that an announcement is imminent, Downing Street said ministers were looking seriously at calls from charities, led by Save the Children, for the UK to admit at least 3,000 unaccompanied young people who have arrived in Europe from countries including Syria and Afghanistan, and who are judged to be at serious risk of falling prey to people traffickers. Government sources said such a humanitarian gesture would be in addition to the 20,000 refugees the UK has already agreed to accept, mainly from camps on the borders of Syria, by 2020.

Tim Farron isn’t counting any chickens until the announcement is made, saying tonight that he wants to see firm action:

I have repeatedly called for the UK to take in 3,000 unaccompanied refugee orphans and the government must now move from ‘looking’ at the issue to actually rolling out a plan to offer these youngsters a home.

Those who have made it to European shores now face cold winters, harsh conditions and are vulnerable to traffickers and those who want to exploit them. Every moment longer the Prime Minister takes to decide leaves a child alone, without protection and without a future.

We must open our hearts to those in need and I will keep pressing at this for as long as it takes. We can and must help.

It would certainly be very wrong of Downing Street to be briefing so positively if it were not on the brink of taking action. Let’s hope that they just get on with it soon.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Catherine Jane Crosland 24th Jan '16 - 10:25am

    It is important to remember that the reason that the children of the Kindertransport were “unaccompanied” was not, in most cases, that they did not have parents, but that Britain, tragically, only agreed to take unaccompanied children. Yes, the lives of thousands of children were saved, but the vast majority of these children never saw their parents again- or their brothers and sisters who were too young to be sent away alone, or too old to qualify for the Kindertransport. If only Britain had agreed to welcome whole families, and single adults as well.
    I realise the case of the unaccompanied Syrian children is rather different, in that many may be orphans, or have become separated from their parents. But our natural eagerness to help the children, we should not forget that adults are in danger too

  • Katerina Porter 24th Jan '16 - 5:40pm

    This move by the government is very welcome and long overdue. It is not our welfare system that attracts migrants and asylum seekers. Ours is not particularly generous, other countries like France have better ones. Many want to come because they can speak English, many have family here. And many have an idea of the kind of country Britain was, but seems to be moving away from being. When a poor country like Jordan, population four and a half million, has taken in one million, and we with a population of 60 million are dribbling in 20,000 over five years, it is shaming.

  • This “related content” caught my eye:

    Kent struggles with refugee children who arrive alone – ‘we’ve used up every foster carer we have’
    [ ]

    There does seem to be rather a lot of people vying for the media spotlight but missing the problems on their own doorstep. I do hope that the register of 10,000 prospective adoptive families that Home for Good claim to have [ ], has been given to social services to see if children already in care can be placed with them…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Roland
    More detail needed. My cousin had an operation cancelled several times over the last two years. Once because the implant manufacturer announced a vastly upgr...
  • Tristan
    Too much of th discussion assumes money belongs to the government that does the taxation, rather than to the people who are taxed. Ultimately tax is compulsor...
  • Joe Bourke
    Aggregate spending in the economy equates to GDP i.e. National income or what is produced. What is produced (including public services) is determined by the pro...
  • Simon R
    I think this article is correct in pointing out that you can't spend money without raising the money first, and is also correct to call out the damaging way tha...
  • Peter Martin
    We're always reading about tearing down the blue wall. What about the 'red wall'? Although it probably does need renaming after the Starmerite takeover. This...