Online campaigning: confirmation of email’s importance

I previously covered the Brunel study into how much campaigning is going on around the country, coming to the conclusion that it was “mediocre news for democracy, good news for the Lib Dems”.

Looking at more details of the poll (and thanks to the team for providing them), it’s striking by how widespread email campaigning is.

Of the people who said they were contacted by at least one campaign in February 2010, “mail” (probably including leaflets through the letterbox in the absence of a specific option for that) came out top:

92% received at least one item from Lib Dems, 89% from Conservatives and 81% from Labour

Second was email:

12% received at least one item from Lib Dems, 18% from Conservatives and 12% from Labour

Door knocking, meeting in the street and phone calls all came lower down.

It extends what I’ve written before about the importance of email as an online campaigning tool (and a largely unsung hero that has been around for quite a while now):

Email briefings, online submission of artwork, internal reference websites and more – most party organisations would stagger near collapse if the internet was turned off.

From this administrative perspective, 2010 won’t be the first internet election; it’ll be the third internet election.

Another recent survey confirms the picture from the Brunel survey of the Liberal Democrats doing well in volume of campaigning compared to the other parties, particularly when you consider the smaller number of seats the party is fighting seriously to win:

The main parties will try to contact millions of voters duringthis year’s election – by leaflets, phone calls and personalvisits to their homes. Have you personally been contactedby any of the parties in any of these ways during the pasttwo or three weeks? Please tick all that apply:

By Conservatives: 18%
By Labour: 16%
By Liberal Democrats: 14%
By some other party: 3%
By none of them: 60%

Source: YouGov 1-2 April

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Online politics.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Chloe, "Who picks up the tab for the net fiscal deficit of the Scottish & Welsh governments " You're absolutely right that it should be t...
  • Tony Vickers
    @Tom Reeve you sort of get it but lets be specific how we'd pay for raising the income tax threshold. We would tax the annual rental value of land. Its been our...
  • cim
    Matt (Bristol): for single-member AV it's not terrible, but most ways of including it in multi-member STV break the proportional representation aspect very badl...
  • Rif Winfield
    Jack, you are absolutely right, as were Tom Ellis and the young David Lloyd George. The tragedy of the Newport meeting in January 1896 was that it set back the ...
  • Diana Simpson
    You would have a problem of public transport capacity to cope with kids going home in the rush hour(s) rather than before it. Our local buses are missed out whi...