Ed Davey: Onshore windfarm opposition risks UK jobs

Wind turbine - Some rights reserved by thomas vlThe Guardian reports:

Energy secretary Ed Davey has warned that the Conservative party’s opposition to onshore wind turbines risks undermining the creation of British jobs as new data showed 15,400 people are now employed in the wind power industry.

…But Davey said that the Conservative party’s “ideological” opposition to onshore turbines was undermining new British jobs and driving up customer bills because wind is the cheapest clean energy.

“We have had a major leap forward in recent years and there is a really good story to tell,” Davey said. “But I want to be clear I am having a go at the Conservative party here. It has made it clear onshore wind is something they don’t want to see in the future expansion of low-carbon energy and I think that is undermining investment now and undermining jobs.”

You can read the full article here.

* Newsmoggie – bringing you comment on the Lib Dems whether it's deserved or not

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • According to Renewable UK each job costs the taxpayer a £115,000 in subsidies.

    The Renewable Energy Foundation estimates that the subsidies to wind farm owners is £1.8 billion.

    What an utter disgrace. Ed Davey should be sacked.

  • Richard Dean 13th Nov '14 - 2:25am

    £115,000 is something like 4 to 5 times the median income. So if the same was spent on subsidies onshore, it might have created something like 75,000 onshore jobs, instead of the 15,400 it created offshore. So is there be some other beneficial factor involved?

    Reducing carbon emissions, for example? 🙂 Making our air cleaner and our soils less polluted? Reducing risks to aquifers? Reducing energy imports? Reducing dependence on countries whose governments or cultures are uncomfortable for us? Potential future export sales of offshore windfarm machinery, or expertise?

  • Tony Rowan-Wicks 13th Nov '14 - 10:04am

    Puzzling analysis of payments to land-owners which suggests that the only ones being paid to rent their land are those where wind-farms are located. Are other locations for generating power always free? I suspect the full data is never shared on these topics – only the apparently debate-winning data.

    A second point concerns the said Mr Pickles. Is he not the same minister who is destrying the High Street, the local Councils, probably society as we used to know it? It is interesting that Mr Cameron puts people into positions which allow them to undermine his own more centrist ideas (will not call them principles).

  • Tony Rowan-Wicks 13th Nov '14 - 10:07am

    Oops no corrections possible yet. [for ‘destroying’]

  • It is good to be able to agree with Ed Davey on something.
    In The Guardian article he makes the good point that the public stance of Conservatives on wind power is like a contagion spreading to attitudes towards all renewables.

    The lessons from Germany on electricity production and energy security ought to be learned by the UK Conservatives (keeping in mind that Germany has a right wing government for a long time now).
    A high proportion of electricity generated in Germany comes from solar panels on the roofs of ordinary homes. But the ignorant stupidity of the UK Conservative stance on all renewables slows the progress towards greater take up of solar in this country.

    Whose interests are the UK Conservatives serving by attacking sustainable energy sources which benefit ordinary families as well as the environment?

    Of course, if we had invested more in renewables when we had the chance instead of running after over-subsidised new nuclear (despite our promises of NO SUBSIDIES) we would be in a better position to attack the Conservtives.

  • Really. I have been looking across the issues on lib dem voice. How have you people supported this horrible government for so long? You’re better than that

  • Daniel Henry 13th Nov '14 - 8:21pm

    Democracy Alan.
    This is the only government that could form following the result of the 2010 elections so it’s the one that did.

  • Are the jobs at risk EU jobs or UK jobs will they pay a fair wage will the normal person see cost advantages how much extra power do we need to generate because of the increased population. If the population keeps growing can we ever get energy security. What has happened to wave power should the government force free solar panels on all roofs

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 7th Dec - 4:43pm
    Peter, “As a Labour supporter you are not very confidence of a Labour victory.” I have the same problem with the football team I support...
  • User AvatarIan 7th Dec - 1:49pm
    We are still targeting way too many seats. Our objective should be - as the party says - to deprive the Tories of a majority,...
  • User Avatarmarcstevens 7th Dec - 12:59pm
    Thomas - on what you say about the trains I wholeheartedly agree with you. I was toying with the idea of having them run by...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 7th Dec - 11:49am
    Peter, this paper is a little academic http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue64/Fiebiger64.pdf but discusses the appropriate use of sectoral financial balance analysis, much in the way the Wynne Godley...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 7th Dec - 11:09am
    Simon So you’re happy with IPSO? If not, what do you propose?
  • User AvatarJonathan Fryer 7th Dec - 11:01am
    For me one of the most significant outcomes of the otherwise often discordant NATO Summit was the acceptance by all 29 member states that China...
Tue 10th Dec 2019