Opinion: Charles Kennedy: Loss of a great leader

Formidable, talented, passionate and hugely inspirational, Charles had deep conviction and was able to engage the public in a way no other politician could. That gave him a level of public popularity rarely enjoyed by a political party leader. Above all else he was highly principled and when Tony Blair took us into the Iraq war supported by the Conservatives, he stood firm to those principles against the political establishment. Despite being heckled and shouted down in Parliament and criticised widely he remained resolutely against a war which he knew was fundamentally wrong.

That principled stand was significant in the historic 2004 Leicester South By-election, where media arrived from all over the world. I recall speaking to a number of international film crews from as far away as India and Japan. They were unclear on whether the British public supported the war or not and seemed to have a collective view that this particular By-election would be seen abroad as a Referendum on the Iraq war. Would the British public support Tony Blair’s decision to go to war through the ballot box?

During the campaign, I was with Charles one afternoon when in an effort to wrong-foot him a British journalist in the presence of camera crews asked why the Liberal Democrats had referred to my name as Parmjit Singh Gill in some literature, while using only Parmjit Gill in other material?  Was it because the party was somehow trying to conceal my minority background to secure more votes in some areas? Without hesitation and effortlessly an amused Charles responded, “I think it’s fairly evident from the name Parmjit and for all to see turning in my direction, what Parmjit’s identity is,” leaving the journalist speechless.

On another occasion, dozens of Labour activists tried to disrupt a rally meeting, many dressed in chicken outfits and making as much noise as they possibly could while screaming criticism at Charles for not supporting the war. Inside the very packed venue, TV media had gathered in abundance in anticipation of how he would respond to the demonstration outside and respond in true form, he did. “With all the hullabaloo outside any right-minded person would think that we had been in Government for the last several years.” There was an enormous rupture of laughter throughout the venue as he had clearly captured the moment so exceptionally well.

The courageous position Charles had taken against the war delivered Leicester its first MP from a Liberal Party in almost a century, in a city where even Sir Winston Churchill did not win when he stood as a Liberal. Proof enough, that conviction matters and where you demonstrate honesty on a matter of principle, the public can and does engage. Following the By-election victory, I received calls from relatives and friends all over the world including India, Canada, South Africa, the Middle East, Germany, France and the USA, both congratulating and supporting the principled stand taken by Charles. He had indeed reached out and engaged the public, and far beyond these British shores.

It was both a privilege and a pleasure to have served in Parliament under one of the finest political leaders in our time and I’m filled with tears and deep sadness for the loss of such a kind and generous friend who still had much to contribute to British politics.

* Parmjit Singh Gill is Chair of Leicester Liberal Democrats, Vice Chair of East Midlands Region Liberal Democrats and was MP for Leicester South from 2004-05.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Labour activists in chicken outfits ??!! It’s important to remember how they (and the Tories) treated us – and Charles in particular at that time. Today the debates about Iraq are all very civilised: the other parties graciously admit we were right. But we remember how they treated us then. Charles of course was too big a man to hold grudges. I suppose awe should try and emulate him. But it’s hard!

  • Eddie Sammon 5th Jun '15 - 3:57pm

    Good article. It is clear now Charles was very ill. The Lib Dems should try to make alcoholism a campaign theme. Amongst all other illnesses of course. But it certainly needs more attention.

  • Denis Loretto 6th Jun '15 - 11:01am

    I well remember going to Leicester to canvass for Parmjit. It was a great victory.
    As to Charles, two points about his courageous leadership on Iraq –
    1. His leading role at the million strong anti-war march on February 15 2003 was against the advice of several of his senior colleagues who felt it might demean him in his role as Party Leader.
    2. On March 18 2003 every one of the 53 Lib Dem MPs attended the decisive debate in the House of Commons and Charles led a totally united party in voting that there was no moral case for war against Iraq.

  • What changed for Libya?

  • J George SMID 9th Jun '15 - 12:42pm

    ” … that conviction matters and where you demonstrate honesty on a matter of principle, the public can and does engage.”
    We need to repeat this over and over again. Not only in remembrance of Charles Kennedy, but for our leadership elections, for our future identity, for our way forward. There is a comment by Dennis Loretto noting that “Charles led a totally united party”. Two sides of the same coin: conviction and leadership. We need another Charles Kennedy.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    Geoffrey is right which is of course the reason at the last general election so many of those who actually did vote labour dis so with so little enthusiasm and ...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "Many people driving around in fifteen year old cars is an economic reality. " What's wrong with a fifteen year old car if it has been maintained properly. I...
  • David Raw
    @ Chloe In privately owned institutions supplying personal care too often the prime driver is profit not people, that's certainly been my experience....
  • Chloe
    Many people driving around in fifteen year old cars is an economic reality. Public transport outside of large cities is almost nonexistent at unsociable hours. ...
  • Chloe
    Of course David that's understandable. Sadly, too many times we've heard the usual PR statements rolled out. Robust measures will be put in place. Lessons mu...