Opinion: Crime, transport and the battle for London Mayor

Just six months ago today London was emerging from its third night of rioting, with a semblance of order only just beginning to take hold as a massive police presence descended on the city. The fear in the streets was palpable. We had been given a brief and terrifying glimpse of what sheer anarchy looked like, the rage and shameless opportunism of London’s marginalised youth provoking deep existential questions about what was wrong with our society.

Yet, as the contest for London Mayor begins to build up momentum, Ken and Boris’ campaigns continue to revolve around the same old topic of public transport, ignoring the deeper societal issues at stake. Whether it’s Ken promising to slash fares, or Boris pledging to take over Greater London’s railway lines, every day the Evening Standard seems to contain yet another headline pandering to its readership of tired commuters.

These debates are no doubt of significant concern to voters who are feeling the squeeze of recession. Indeed, Lib Dem candidate Brian Paddick has made fairer fares a central aspect of his campaign. Yet with the Mayor recently gaining significant powers over the Metropolitan Police, and polls showing that crime is the number one issue for voters, policing should be at the top of the agenda. On top of this, there needs to be more of a debate about how to tackle the underlying causes of crime, in particular how to regenerate those neglected parts of the capital which remain blighted by violence. After all, vote-winning promises may make good headlines, but they do nothing do tackle the problems of social exclusion which continue to plague our capital.

These are the issues on which Brian Paddick has a real advantage over the other two candidates, with his extensive experience in the Metropolitan Police working in some of London’s most difficult areas. This is perhaps why the other two candidates have been so keen to steer the debate towards issues of transport, where vote-winning pledges are easily made and complex societal problems easily avoided. Brian’s visits to riot-afflicted areas such as Tottenham stand in stark contrast to Boris Johnson’s notorious refusal to cut his holiday short when the disturbances initially broke out. Moreover, Brian’s proposals to improve community relations with police, for example by stopping discriminatory stop and search practices, have shown an innovative approach to addressing the deep-seated problems which fuelled the riots in the first place.

The Lib Dem Mayoral candidate has also shown he is willing to go against the status quo and take bold decisions. As Police Commander in Brixton, scene of so many anti-police riots in the past, Paddick won huge cross-community support by shifting policing efforts away from cannabis arrests and towards tackling street-crime. That may have earnt him widespread vilification in the tabloid press, but it won him the admiration and support of the local community.  Brian also repeatedly criticised the Met’s handling of the 2005 Jean Charles de Menezes’ shooting, and more recently criticised the police investigation of the News of the World phone-hacking scandal, of which he himself was a victim. This unique perspective, combining a direct experience of policing with a willingness to address entrenched institutional problems, puts him in an ideal position to tackle some of London’s most pressing issues.

Ken Livingstone’s recent pledge to increase police numbers may be a sign that the issue of crime is finally gaining prominence in the campaign for London mayor. This may in turn help to spark a much-needed public debate over crime, and give greater prominence to some of Brian Paddick’s proposed policies to improve policing. It is therefore crucial that these aspects of his campaign are conveyed to as many people as possible, and that they receive the coverage they deserve. This should not only help raise his profile in his bid for Mayor, but also give the whole party a boost in the London Assembly elections.

* Paul Haydon has recently completed an MSc in European Public Policy at University College London.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Personally, I think we should be focusing on the Mayor’s weakest link, the deputy mayor and chair of the MPA, Kit Maltloaf, who oversaw the police’s inadequate response to the riots and the whitewash of phone hacking and police corruption complaints (described by Boris as “codswallop”) against his mates in the Tory media (oh and much of this was going on while Ken Livingstone was mayor as well).

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Jenny Barnes
    Apparently the average domestic energy price rise across the EU is 41%, while in the UK it's over 200%....
  • Peter Watson
    @Michael BG "I don’t think anyone knows how the vote will go between option 1 ... and option 2" I fear that the long grass of Option 3 will prove to be an ap...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Martin, Indeed, it was a Lib Dem policy to increase the Income Tax personal allowance above inflation each year to remove those on the lowest pay from ...
  • Sadhbh
    I believe energy price rices of only 4% are planned in France where the energy companies are nationalised. Maybe there is a lesson to be learned from this?...
  • William Wallace
    Responses to populism are difficult to judge - because the essence of populism is to reject reasoned argument, and to blame elites (often portrayed as plotting ...