Opinion: Digital Economy Act – The fight isn’t over

It’s difficult to quantify the mess the Labour government left us in. Sure, the £158,000,000,000 annual deficit they left behind was one big quantity. But there were also the thousands of children being held in detention, our civil liberties in tatters, university finances out of control, record low levels of house building… the list seems endless.

But seemingly this wasn’t enough for Labour. In their dying breath they created yet another mess for the next government to sort. The Digital Economy Bill was forced through Parliament in its last week before recessing for the General Election campaign.

Grassroots Lib Dems made their objections clearly felt at 2010’s spring conference. Despite having plenty on their hands as PPCs, Bridget Fox and Julian Huppert tabled an emergency motion which raised key objections to the Bill’s most controversial clauses: website blocking and the termination of Internet connections.

Yesterday’s announcement by Vince Cable saw a big chunk of the motion become government policy. The website blocking clauses of the Digital Economy Act are now dead. While caution must still remain regarding other legislation that could be having similar effects, this is nonetheless a huge success.

But that’s only half of our objections quenched. The termination of Internet accounts is still very much on this government’s agenda, despite the serious impact this will have on the day-to-day lives of people who get caught up in this bad legislation, as well as the erosion of our online liberty we are all now to be subjected to.

So while there is something to celebrate, we’ve only won half of the battle. An illiberal new £20 charge simply to appeal an unfair accusation of copyright infringement shows that the entertainment industry lobbyists still have significant pull on the government’s thinking. They aren’t going to stop lobbying. So we must not stop campaigning to get the draconian Internet disconnection laws wiped from our country’s statute books.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    Caron, Why do you think those by-elections are the ones remembered? I thought Bermondsey in 1983 was one. Croydon North West in 1981 was the first win for...
  • Barry Lofty
    Jayne Mansfield: Thanks for your kind thoughts, yes I will enjoy the moment but come back down to earth soon enough and quite agree about the opposition party's...
  • John Marriott
    Continuing on the initial theme (C & A), one could add that this wasn’t just any by election victory; this was an M & S by election victory by any st...
  • James Paton
    could win this seat. Was making some calls to voters/members, the response was mostly positive but still can't believe it!...
  • Michael 1
    @David Raw Hi, Eeyore ! Well - as you know full well local by-elections in Scotland are odd and as Mark P explains because they are conducted under STV/A...