Opinion: Is political journalism broken?

The Lib Dem conference felt united this year. I’m not talking about our policies – heaven forfend. No, we were united against the media’s reporting of our conference, which was, almost without exception, drearily inane, pathetically irrelevant and lazily inaccurate.

Sitting on the train back from Brighton, I overheard one Hampstead-chic journalist talk about why she chose her profession. It was, she said, because she wanted to change the world, and the media is so much more able than politicians to make people sit up and take notice. Noble sentiments, indeed.

But how far do she and her journalist colleagues live up to this enlightenment standard?

I’m not going to indulge in a rant, tempting though it is, dissecting each and every injustice inflicted on the Lib Dems by the media in the past week.

And I’m aware that the conference can sometimes become a self-deluding bubble, with party members snuggling up together in comfort-blanket group-think. Think IDS’s last Tory conference as leader in 2003, his speech interrupted by an absurd 20 standing ovations. Or think CK’s last Lib Dem conference in 2005, when members returned from Blackpool bemused by claims his leadership was being questioned by our MPs.

However, I’m confident this time was different. Why?

Because the media based all its leadership speculation stories not on off-the-record-whispered-behind-their-hand briefings, but by deliberately distorting on-the-record-spoken-out-loud-and-in-public statements.

Nick Clegg may have been naïve to say he’d “probably” stand for the leadership when Ming retires – but why shouldn’t he say so? His choices were either to (i) stonewall the question with a bland ‘there is no vacancy’ line, in which case he’s condemned as one of those typical obfuscating politicians; or (ii) to tell the truth. He chose the latter and suffered the consequences. But do we really want our politicians to be cool, calculated doublespeak-your-weight automatons?

It’s the usual Catch-22 – the media decries politicians for being dull, and then exploits their occasional off-message asides, blowing them up to become prominent gaffes, splits and plots. Cue politicians retreating back inside themselves, drawing up their drawbridges. Cue the public feeling ever more disconnected from the political elites.

There is a crisis of confidence in British journalism today. The divergence between what is worth reporting and what is actually reported is growing larger. Such is the pressure on journalists to produce copy their editors think the public wants to read that they follow each other round in ever decreasing circulations.

Talk to a journalist, and they know all this. Most of them went into their profession for precisely the idealistic reason my fellow passenger asserted: to tell people what’s happening in the world in order to change it for the better. But, sadly, that’s not what journalism is now about. Facts are fitted round the pre-ordained story. If something happens ‘outwith’ the media agenda it might as well never have existed.

It’s time for our journalists to regain their confidence, to begin to believe again that what they have to say really can matter, to report stories as they happen, and not simply according to a pre-arranged editorial line. Who knows? They may even find they enjoy reclaiming the nobility of their profession.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Spot on, Stephen.

    And if anyone wants evidence, one need look no further than the headline on the BBC News website’s report on Ming’s brilliant speech. What was their headline? “I’m not too old, says Sir Menzies”. Well done, BBC.

  • As usual, spot on Stephen. It’s not as simple as the Lib Dem membership just being typically self-pitying when they criticise the media. The public are starting to realise how much the media hoodwinks & misinforms them too.

    It says a lot that in opinion polls of which professions are trusted the most, journalists are second only to politicians themselves in terms of the public’s lack of faith.

  • “I overheard one Hampstead-chic journalist talk about why she chose her profession. It was, she said, because she wanted to change the world”

    Surely the job of a journalist not to change the world but to *report it* honestly.

    The problem with political journalism is two fold. It is either a subset of the entertainment industry, constantly trying to find the “dramatic” story to keep its readers, viewers, and listeners interested. That’s why it’s always coniving at stories of “splits” and “leadership crises”

    Or else it is agenda based and reports that agenda whether it coincides with what is actually going on or not.

    Most horrendously it is a mixture of the two. Hence the reporting of this years conference.

  • I should declare an interest – whenever I have to listen to Hampstead-chic journalists on public transport I want to kill them no matter what they’re saying, so I can only admire your ability to look on the bright side.

    But I’m with Moggy on this. The journalist ought to be the very antithesis of ego, they ought to be as wary of changing the world around them as a time traveller. After x years of reporting in this way, they may then acquire a natural authority which allows them to become opinion formers in their own right, cf Jon Snow, and even attempt to influence events on the ground when the times are sufficiently dire, cf Christine whatshername off CNN during the siege of Sarajevo, you-know-who-I-mean.

    For the last two centuries at least, any journalist who really had the guts and conviction – and the luck – to have a serious stab at changing the world chucked in their hack job, found a backer and started their own paper. Bloody revolution aside, maybe we need a little more of that…

  • Geoffrey Payne 25th Sep '07 - 12:55pm

    Journalists have changed the world in the past. They have even managed to do so on the odd ocassion by reporting the truth.
    The 2 are not incompatable.
    As far as the Lib Dem conference is concerned, and probably other conferences too, the conference that actually happens and the one that is reported are simply far apart.
    Andrew Neil, who hates the Lib Dems, covered the event for the “impartial” BBC! I saw his conference reports and they were a travesty.

  • Geoffrey Payne 25th Sep '07 - 1:00pm

    And another thing…
    There is nothing at all wrong in being ambitious. Why should Nick Clegg have to adhere to the stupid etiquette of denying any interest in standing for the leadership of the party, whenever in the future that will be?
    It is obvious that despite their ambitions, neither Nick Clegg nor Chris Huhne are plotting against the leadership. In fact noone at all is, yet that is all the media decided to report on.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 29th May - 5:40pm
    There are occasional differences in the Conservative Party. Please consider their first elected leader, Edward Heath, organ scholar and sailor ISBN 0 340 70582 2,...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 29th May - 5:29pm
    David Raw, this is the FT comment on the last Libdem manifesto https://www.ft.com/content/b1f66762-0b96-11ea-bb52-34c8d9dc6d84 "...the manifesto confirms the Lib Dems are now a borrow, tax and...
  • User AvatarJames Young 29th May - 5:03pm
    Re Cummings , I am sure you would not be bored if a member of your family had Covid ,like my sister. I desperately wanted...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 29th May - 4:50pm
    @Matt (Bristol) Thanks for the question. sometimes, I find discussion in threads below an article stimulate my thinking more than writing the article in the...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 29th May - 4:37pm
    Thanks George for your thoughtful reply. I should have been clear that I meant I was speaking as a self-identified social democrat, although I know...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 29th May - 4:36pm
    @ Joe B, "....creating money does not create wealth" You've made this point before. What would you say about destroying money? Would that destroy wealth?...