Opinion: Nick Clegg and Scarman

We have grown used to politicians approaching the issue of ‘race’ in the context of immigration, crime, or the aftermath of a tragedy.

So it was enormously refreshing to hear Nick Clegg offer up a well-informed speech on the quest for true race equality, without a negative backdrop.

Delivering a Scarman Lecture on the 30th anniversary of the ground-breaking report into the 1981 Brixton riots, Clegg gave arguably the best speech on race equality by a Cabinet minister.

It was Liberal Democracy at its best, bravely shattering the conspiracy of silence on one of the biggest issues of the day – the scandal of the shockingly disproportionate outcomes for black, Asian and minority ethnic communities.

As I listened, the question of what took us so long was eclipsed by a swelling pride; this was what I always believed social liberalism was all about.

Stepping into the arena of race from a progressive standpoint is always going to attract a hail of brickbats from the right but the great Liberals of yesteryear always faced down the howls of reactionaries.

Clegg located the issue firmly in the context of our party’s tradition. He said:

The state-led, law-led approach can only take you part of the way. If you assume the state has all the answers, you absolve other parts of society from playing their part. You let businesses off the hook and you discourage activity in the wider community to support young, enterprising men and women from ethnic minorities too.

In focussing on economic injustice he touched on hidden factors, often invisible even to the victims, and shone a much-needed light on the subtle dynamics of racism in today’s society.

African-Caribbean unemployment is running at twice the rate of white unemployment. So few British-born people of colour sit in the top City boardrooms. So few would-be entrepreneurs are getting bank loans to start a new business.

Clegg’s speech demonstrated that Liberals can indeed shape a discourse that has hitherto been a depressing bun fight between Labour supporters and the forces of conservatism.

Too often Liberals have opted out of this debate, taking refuge in purist colour-blindness when all around is evidence of racial discrimination.

Clegg has shown we can have the confidence to propose solutions to succeed in challenging the casual racism which contributes to the hugely unfair outcomes and undermines justice in our whole society.

If we back our words up with far-reaching policies, Lib Dems can look back with pride in years to come and say: at the very time when the issue race equality was at its’ most unpopular, we took the mantle and made great inroads to making Britain a fairer place for people of colour.

What was notable about the first wave of attack, in the  threads of online news stories, was how inarticulate the response was. Few critics took on Clegg’s arguments, instead resorting to abuse.

If we, as a party, can face this down and drive forward, we will be remembered for it.

It requires turning words into actions. The inquiry into bank lending, led by Andrew Stunell and Lynne Featherstone, is a start. But much more is needed.

As Clegg rightly pointed out, it is in Britain’s economic interests not to waste talent. He said:

If we tapped into the full potential of our black and ethnic minority communities, imagine the benefits and prosperity that would bring? Now is the moment to unleash black talent, for the good of us all.

Black and Asian people are estimated to earn £165 billion a year after tax, but it could be so much higher. Conversely the cost to the taxpayer of disproportionate educational under-achievement, unemployment and criminal justice is in the a huge drain on the state.

Deal with school exclusions, create a level playing field with job opportunities and entrepreneurship, and all Britain will be better off.

Generations have lost out because colour-blind policies of successive governments either caused, or failed to deal with, underlining racial inequalities.

Some political ideas may benefit BME communities in theory – our coalition policy of raising of the tax threshold is one. But how it pans out in reality is another story.

There is nothing illiberal about seeking to change outcomes; it is conservative not to. Changing outcomes for Britain’s BME communities means being radical, or to put it another way, being Liberal – in the old-fashioned sense.

We need an holistic and radical vision, applying our solutions to every aspect of life where hard figures tell us unequal racial outcomes are stark.

Two-fifths of BME households live in poverty, double the rate of white households. African and Caribbean youths are nine times more likely to be stopped and searched.

There is much that the state can do to change this.

There is also much that grassroots and political pressure can do to encourage the private sector to employ diverse talent.

Lord Scarman called for a “direct coordinated attack on racial disadvantage”. In his speech, Clegg responded: “It’s time we resurrected the Scarman sprit to tackle the lack of opportunities for our ethnic communities. The barriers built into everyday life.”

It was Dr Martin Luther King who said true peace is not merely the absence of tension: it is the presence of justice. Let us be for racial justice, not in just theory but in practice.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

9 Comments

  • David Pollard 28th Nov '11 - 3:04pm

    Great stuff Lester. Don’t hesitate to come out with policy solutions to direct the next LibDem influence in government. What goes in the manifesto could well end up in a Coalition agreement and be enacted.

  • Meral Hussein Ece 29th Nov '11 - 10:21am

    An excellent article Lester. On the issue of race and inequality, it seems that Nick Clegg is the first senior member of the government to make such an important speech on the anniversary of the ground breaking Scarman Report.
    Phrases like ” We (the Government) should face racism with an iron fist” will resonate with significant numbers within the Black and minority ethnic communities, for whom racism is still sadly an everyday fact of life.
    This must now be followed up by radical measures to ensure we minimise the scourge of racism in our society, allowing everyone to reach their full potential.

  • Jonathan Hunt 30th Nov '11 - 2:36pm

    Thanks Lester for highlighting publicy the significance of Nick’s Brixton speech. It’s good to have you back in action.

    Those of us who have trying to get the party to fully embrace what is allowed under the law by positive action (which far too many in the party still confuse with positive discrimination) must welcome this speech.

    We must ensure that the party adopts such measures as are required to counter previous discrimination, introduce fast-tracking and other sensible measures that thousands of British employers have used to be able to utilise the full talents of all its workforce.

    At the moment, the backwoodsmen and women from Midsomer constituencies have only agreed a few of those measures at conference, and so that is regarded as the extent of its remit by the Diversity Group.

    We also need a Campaign for Ethnic Balance, to emulate what women Lib Dems have been more successful in achieving.

  • Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera 2nd Dec '11 - 11:00am

    Lester this is an excellent article but the Rev Arun Arora, a Guardian reader adds an interesting point as well, that we ‘The Party’ should be aware of:

    “In his Scarman memorial lecture (Report, 24 November) Nick Clegg rightly challenged those in football and banking, asking why it is that for members of ethnic minority communities often “their success doesn’t match their ambitions”. I applaud him for raising this issue, but is it not a little rich coming from the leader of a party that has failed in the past five general elections to elect a non-white MP?

    The last general election saw the Conservative and Labour parties between them elect 27 MPs from ethnic minority backgrounds – double the number in the previous parliament. Contrast this with the Liberal Democrats, whose failure to have any minority ethnic representation among its own 57 MPs is the kind of statistic for which other organisations would be rightly excoriated. This shameful situation is made worse by the fact that both the current equalities minister, Lynne Featherstone, and the minister for race and community cohesion, Andrew Stunell, belong to a party which – alone among the main three parties – has no black or Asian MPs. Thirty years on from the Scarman report, the Lib Dem parliamentary party seems to be one of the last bastions of a monochrome enclave”

    Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/nov/28/monochrome-party-liberal-democrats-race

    Ultimately at the next election we will be judged on our deeds, and not our words.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 22nd Nov - 12:34pm
    At PMQ on 22/11/2017 Theresa May said that Labour has never had a female leader. This is a matter of record and should be a...
  • User AvatarSheila Gee 22nd Nov - 12:14pm
    “This is a case where Politicians have to show some Leadership & decide for themselves whats best.” They have. A parliamentary majority endorsed the EU...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 22nd Nov - 12:00pm
    The "Will of The People" is an idea that appeals to Dictators & Extremists of Left or Right. The People dont exist, theres just People,...
  • User AvatarWilliam Fowler 22nd Nov - 11:58am
    Helen, surely the solution is very cheap or free public transport for historic centres such as Bath to new towns (and decent cycle paths) rather...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 22nd Nov - 11:57am
    You are right, Wera. There is sufficient uncertainty that it is undemocratic not to offer the people another referendum though this time it must be...
  • User AvatarWilliam Fowler 22nd Nov - 11:55am
    You need to let householders build one bed houses in their gardens, exempt from capital gains tax etc and planning constraints as long as they...