Opinion: Once again, the French show a little bit more imagination…

The reduction in VAT from 17.5% to 15% quickly condemned and rightly so, by Vince Cable, as expensive and ineffective is one of this government’s more costly errors. The one year only cut will cost us the incredible sum of £12.5 billion pounds and has done little to stimulate consumer spending, simply because despite the enormous cost it still seems so meaningless at the till.

Indeed, it may will come with a sting in the tail, as when it comes to an end and VAT goes back to 17.5% it will come with a sharp inflationary jolt which may well trim back some of those ‘green shoots’ that Labour will being telling us about this winter.

The French, as usual, have shown a little bit more imagination. From July 1st, the VAT on meals (not alcoholic beverages though) in restaurants has been cut from 19.6% to 5.5%. This has been translated in to a reduction of 15% on a typical ‘Menu’, my favourite bistro in Paris having reduced their menu from 19 to 16.50 euros. In return the restaurant trade had guaranteed to create 40,000 more jobs to add to the 600,000 they already provide, including 20,000 new apprenticeships.

In three Paris restaurants I ate at last week, the owners all said the effect had been positive and immediate. One told me that his business for July had been 25% up on the previous year as a lot of confidence had been restored and his customers given both an excuse and a justification for eating out more often!

The cost? 2.3 billion euros or 2 billion pounds in a full year. Less than a sixth of the cost of Uncle Gordon’s VAT reduction. Once again, the French have shown a little bit more imagination and got a lot more value for the French taxpayer.

I hope our Treasury Team can come up with some similarly imaginative schemes for our manifesto.

* Martin Land is a Cambridgeshire Lib Dem activist and campaigner and blogs at New Model Army.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Andrew Duffield 2nd Sep '09 - 7:25pm

    “The one year only cut will cost us the incredible sum of £12.5 billion pounds” – assuming the recession did nothing to depress ‘normal’ spending of course, which is somewhat unlikely. Arguably, consumers have SAVED £12.5 billion in transactional taxes, benefitting the poor most of all. Labour’s cut has been far too feeble to have had any impact on the economy. Much better to have reduced employers’ NICs, saved thousands of jobs and maintained consumer spending accordingly. That said, I strongly believe we should now be campaigning to leave the rate at 15%, not putting it back up again.

    Given the highly regressive nature of VAT, the most imaginitive thing our Treasury Team could do is to work towards reducing all VAT to 5%, replacing it with progressive taxes on privilege and unearned wealth (i.e. economic rent), and simultaneously pushing for the EU to axe VAT altogether, switching to resource based revenue streams instead – emissions permit auctions, airport slot auctions, spectrum auctions etc etc.

  • € 16.50 is expensive for muesli.

  • Martin Land 3rd Sep '09 - 7:51am

    Actually John, I had a very good Pate followed by a Confit de Canard and an excellent, home-made Tarte Tatin.

  • Simon Titley 3rd Sep '09 - 10:39am

    Andrew – The UK cannot unilaterally reduce the rate of VAT to 5% because the minimum permitted rate within the EU is 15%. There are various derogations on certain product or service categories (such as the UK’s zero-rating of children’s clothes – or indeed the French rate for restaurant meals) but I cannot imagine the other EU members agreeing to a blanket reduction for one member state, because it would provide an unfair trade advantage.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Brad Barrows
    @Christopher Moore I'm afraid I read this article as an attack on the very 'integrity' of Tories for supporting an Elections Bill which opposition parties clai...
  • Michael BG
    Thank you everyone who has posted a comment on my article. Joe Bourke, I am not sure what your point is about the spending which has already been announce...
  • Martin Frost
    No objection to the idea of wearing surgical masks if that is what some people want to do. My point is that the paper masks most people wear offer no protection...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Martin Frost "How many of the pro-mask studies refer to the use of paper masks and their effectiveness? Those I have read refer to surgical or respiratory mas...
  • Martin Frost
    Some questions from this alleged libertarian? How many of the pro-mask studies refer to the use of paper masks and their effectiveness? Those I have read re...
Thu 28th Oct 2021
19:30