Opinion: Supermajority!

The US Senate Elections are finally over!

Last November’s contest has dragged on, primarily as a result of a protracted legal battle in closely fought Minnesota. Last week, however, incumbent Republican Senator Norm Coleman finally abandoned his legal suit after the State’s Supreme Court found unanimously in favour of Democrat Al Franken, the liberal former radio talk show host and author of ‘Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right’. Franken is becoming adept at getting his way in the Courts, Fox News having failed in their bid to sue him for using their ‘Fair and Balanced’ slogan against them.

Franken was sworn in on Tuesday, and his victory belatedly brings the Democratic Caucus to 60, enabling them – theoretically at least – to attain the three-fifths majority needed for a motion of cloture, or guillotine, which would prevent fillibustering Republicans from talking out Democratic measures.

However, not all the 60 were elected as Democrats. Senator Arlen Specter, 79, of Pennsylvania ended 44 years as an elected Republican in April by defecting to the Democrats, but remains rather conservative on crime and national security. And two other Senators, Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, were elected as Independents, and caucus with the Democrats only for Committee allocations. While Sanders seems likely to continue supporting Democratic positions – he describes himself as a ‘democratic socialist’ – Lieberman, Al Gore’s 2000 Vice Presidential running mate, is a less certain vote for Majority Leader Harry Reid, especially on foreign and defence matters. He has been famously hawkish on Iraq and other Middle East issues, and when ousted by a more left-wing opponent in his state’s Democratic primary, he ran as an Independent and retained his Senate seat, receiving much support from Republican voters.

Whether, therefore, the Democrats could actually manage to wield their ‘supermajority’ remains to be tested. As has been noted before in debate on Liberal Democrat Voice, it may not necessarily be a good thing if they do. My own view is that one possible positive effect might be to help stop climate change deniers blocking efforts to combat that particular menace.

* Terry Gilbert is a former Liberal Democrat Parliamentary candidate, and has been a Lib Dem member since 1983.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International.
Advert

2 Comments

  • “My own view is that one possible positive effect might be to help stop climate change deniers blocking efforts to combat that particular menace.”

    And what if said deniers have public support for their blocking measures? Not very democratic are you?

  • Actually, conservative Democrats like Ben Nelson are more likely to be unreliable than Lieberman.

    And you’ve forgotten the few Republican liberals left, such as Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe. All in all, the situation is too fluid to assess.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jonathan Calder
    Do we want to be a low-tax party? It seems the leadership wants to fight the next election on that basis, but I detect no great enthusiasm for the idea among th...
  • Nick Baird
    @Alex @Rees - I was referring to the quoted surveys by VPZ and E-Cigarette Direct, who have a vested interest in selling vapes and are effectively claiming that...
  • Rees Southern
    Hi Nick, as Alex points out, ASH is not a vested interest. Nor are the other organisations mentioned in my article, including the Royal College of Physicians, C...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    I dont think lib dems should be a low tax or high tax party. I would like them (Or someone else) to be a subsidiarist, consensualist party, whereby levels of ta...
  • Alex Macfie
    @Nick Baird: Since when was ASH a "vested interest"? And vested in what?...