Opinion: The importance of a good Number 2

What makes a good deputy? The question is of acute relevance today owing to Senator John McCain’s decision to pick Governor Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential nominee. Her positives have already been well-rehearsed: a young, instinctive, deeply conservative female, with a son about to serve in Iraq. Her negatives have also been loudly broadcast: she has just 18 months experience as the governor of one of the USA’s smaller states, yet could be the 45th president of a superpower within a matter of months should anything happen to her 72 year-old running mate.

Senator McCain’s reason for choosing her is clear: Governor Palin represents his best chance of swinging the momentum of the presidential campaign to the Republican side. Would any of us be discussing his choice now had he picked Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty or even Joe Lieberman? No, we would still be assessing the impact of Senator Obama’s remarkable convention speech, and speculating just how far short would Senator McCain fall when he attempts to match his rival next week. To that extent, her selection is an inspired piece of strategy, which severely wrong-foots the Democrats (as evidenced by their gauche and ungracious response).

But Senator McCain’s choice is disturbing, as this brilliant posting by Andrew Sullivan makes clear:

Think about how the key factor in this decision was not who could defend this country were something dreadful happen to McCain in office but how to tread as much on Obama’s convention bounce and use women’s equality as a wedge issue among Democrats because it might secure a few points here or there. Oh, and everyone would be surprised. And even Rove would be annoyed. This is his sense of honor and judgment. This is his sense of responsibility and service. Here’s the real slogan the McCain campaign should now adopt:

Putting. Country. Last.

For in choosing Governor Palin, Senator McCain has acted in his own short-term interests. He didn’t chose her because she was the best person for the job, but because she was the person most likely to land him the job he wants. What is being lauded today by many as smart tactics will appear shabby opportunism if her boss were incapacitated in the middle of an international crisis.

The Obama camp will have seriously considered the strong likelihood that Senator McCain would choose a female vice-president, though perhaps not her identity. They could themselves have selected a female running mate, whether Hillary Clinton or anyone else, and decided not to do so. Of course it would have been riskier – is the US ready to elect a black President and female Vice-President on the same ticket? – while McCain’s campaign needs an edge to compete with the excitement whipped-up by Senator Obama’s candidacy. But Senator Obama chose not to go down that route. He wanted someone he could both trust, and be believed would be ready to be President in the worst case. His pick wasn’t inspired, it was responsible.

The choice of your running mate is the first really big decision a presidential candidate has to make. Senator McCain, supposedly the guy with the experience to be trusted with big decisions, took a punt on an unknown to extract partisan advantage. Senator Obama rejected the dazzle of a flashy pick, and steered the moderate, sensible course. Which says it all, really.

And brings me back to my original question: what makes a good deputy? I remember there was some mumbling of discontent when Vince Cable was elected by his Commons colleagues as Ming Campbell’s deputy – does it really look good, it was argued, for the Lib Dems to choose two ageing, bald, grey men to take on the party’s leadership?

Yet when Ming unexpectedly resigned the party discovered it had an unassuming political superstar at its helm. Perhaps Vince’s two rivals, Matthew Taylor and David Heath, would have made an equally good fist of the job. But the fact is that Vince was ready, the right guy for the job at the right time. And that is the true measure of a smart choice for deputy.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in LDVUSA and Op-eds.


  • David Heigham 30th Aug '08 - 3:42pm

    Stephen is right about Vince, but wrong about Palin. McCain notoriously, and probably rightly, thinks very poorly of the way the Federal US executive branch of government has been run. He has his eye on shaping it up pretty sharply, and if necessarily radically. He judges that is what the USA needs. A safe pair of hands such as Mitt Romney would not deliver that change if left in charge. Sarah Barracuda has shown in Alñaska that she has the will and determination to try.

    McCain worries me a lot, but I think he has made this pick in the country’s interests; as he sees them.

  • Sorry, I could not get past the title for childish sniggering.

  • We are told that Palin was brought up in Idaho and is a “regular churchgoer”. Does that mean she is a Mormon? Surely not? That was the main reason for rejecting Mitt Romney.

    We are told, too, that Palin’s husband is a Native American. That won’t please the redneck tendency, who regard Native Americans as vermin.

    Although Palin’s views are consistently fairly far to the right, she is unlikely to convince extreme Christian conservatives, who disapprove of women with young children working. Palin has the wrong wardrobe for a Stepford wife.

    It amazes me that Palin ever won a beauty pageant! How many contestants were there? Was it held in the dark? She reminds me of the youthful Rosemary West, just scarier. Still, if beauty ever had anything to do with getting elected to high office, Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon would never have passed the starting line.

    I think the real reason McCain chose Governor Palin was to say to the elite that he doesn’t intend to have a “minder”. He is his own man and will do it his way. Most people understand that Bush is simply a puppet and that it is Cheney who exercises de facto power. McCain wants everyone to know that unlike Bush he himself intends to be the boss. And that is frankly spine-chilling, given what we know about this crazy man.

  • What on earth does Sarah Palin’s looks have to do with anything ?

  • Jayentee wrote:

    “What on earth does Sarah Palin’s looks have to do with anything ?”

    Well, nothing. Except that the Republicans and their media cheerleaders have been trying to make an issue of it.

    There is a further reason why a Presidential candidate might wish to choose a duff running mate. Best summed up by “Private Eye” in its brilliant November, 1968 front cover (one of the “Eye’s” very, very best).

    “Nixon in by Close Shave,” proclaimed the headline. And what did the jubilant Tricky Dicky say? “No-one’s going to shoot me with Spiro T Agnew next in line.”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSheila Gee 20th Mar - 11:06pm
    @Nom de Plume “The LibDem vote share crashed to about 8% at the 2015 election. 57 to 8 seats. This was before the Brexit vote.”...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 20th Mar - 9:51pm
    Mark, surely it's ok if they actually have decent values - and they have the profile to get noticed.
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 20th Mar - 9:28pm
    Fiona - Of course the sixty five year olds may well have been paying NI since they were 16 (a total of 49 years).
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 20th Mar - 9:15pm
    @ David Evans Not forgetting the execution of Timothy Evans (and the great campaign led by our own Ludovic Kennedy to clear his name) -...
  • User AvatarTim13 20th Mar - 9:03pm
    Sheila Gee Even on the 2016 vote, it was only 52% "Leave" to 48% "Remain", so I find your lumping together all those not voting...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 20th Mar - 8:59pm
    I worry when JoeB says things like "and let the British investigators and judicial process follow its customary rigour in determining culpability in due course."...