Osborne claimed £47 for DVD of his own speech on … value for taxpayers’ money

The Evening Standard’s Paul Waugh has been doing some digging into the newly-released MPs’ expenses claims on the Parliamentary website, and has come up with this ‘file-under-you-couldn’t-make-it-up’ story:

Among the tiny fragments of new info available on MPs exes today is this:

George Osborne claimed £47 of taxpayer’s money for two copies of a DVD of his speech – and the speech was on “value for money”.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Herbert Brown 18th Jun '09 - 12:32pm


    Yes, the relevant page of Nick Clegg’s website appears to have been removed within the last fortnight or so.

    But you can still see Google’s cache of the page by doing a Google search and then clicking the “Cached” link:
    site:www.nickclegg.org.uk “nick clegg’s parliamentary expenses”

    The URL of the page was:

    It does actually say “Mortgage payments [interest only] or rent”.

  • I incline towards the cock-up theory as regards Nick

    But £23 for a DVD? That’s what I paid for the extended 4 disc super-edition of Return of the King.

  • Terry Gilbert 18th Jun '09 - 1:22pm

    Surely Osborne has to go, if this is true?

  • Terry Gilbert 18th Jun '09 - 1:57pm

    Just read Paul’s account of his mortgage! Ditto with bells on, if true…

  • Herbert Brown 18th Jun '09 - 2:26pm

    “Maybe as everything is now available online through the parliament website he decided it wasn’t needed on his own website anymore.”

    I don’t think that is the case, as Nick Clegg’s website showed expenses for the first half of 2008-9, whereas (if I understand correctly) the official release on the parliament website only goes up to 2007-8.

    It may well be a cock-up, though the timing is unfortunate.

  • Just looking at the expenses of my opponent at the last election.

    Why (it appears) are MPs allowed to claim food and other expenses during the General Election period when they are merely candidates?

  • Ruth, I think you are correct.
    I recall mention of an MP (who should have known better) who had a claim for a TV refused because it was bought after parliament was dissolved.

  • Ruth

    Because the expense system pretty much consisted of putting a large pile of money in the middle of the room and saying “help yourself boys and girls”.
    Someone on the door checked you hadn’t taken more than your share but that was about it.

    I’m sure those Lib Dem MPs who claimed the max of £4800 a year food allowance (without producing receipts AFAICS) will be able to explain themselves to a single pensioner constituent who (with Pension Credit) gets less than that for the whole year.

    And I’m sure they can point to their criticisms of the system before Heather Brooke started asked awkward questions.

  • Ruth Bright 19th Jun '09 - 8:27am


    I find some of the food claims especially wince-making when our MPs oppose an ANNUAL food grant to pregnant women of £190.

  • Herbert Brown 19th Jun '09 - 5:57pm

    The BBC is saying that the police are conducting a criminal investigation into both MPs and peers over expenses claims, including Baroness Uddin, who claimed allowances in respect of a flat that she wasn’t – allegedly – living in.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Martin Gray
    Ultimately - you cannot sustain the current levels of immigration, & solve the housing crisis simultaneously...Sadly too many progressives are infatuated wi...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "Blaming them for promising amenities (to get planning permission) that they then find endless excuses to delay, however…" A key issue and the one which resu...
  • Joe Bourke
    The Renew Europe demand that the EU Council and Commission take responsibility and finally take further steps to apply Article 7, which could lead to the remova...
  • Cassie
    @Simon R – “I don’t think we can blame developers for building the houses they think they can most easily sell for a profit.” I, for one, wasn't blamin...
  • Joe Bourke
    Vernon Bogdanor has an interesting analysis of the rise of the Reform party in contrast with the SDP of the 1980s https://inews.co.uk/opinion/reform-no-fimmick-...