Oyster Card survey shows heavy interest in cutting coverage or raising prices

During the week I got an email in my inbox asking me to take part in a survey on behalf of the Passenger Demand Forecasting Council (“a body consisting of Transport for London and other industry bodies”) about the future of the Oyster touch in/touch out travel card used in London.

The email went a little overboard in emphasising that the survey was just about finding out people’s attitudes and possible future behaviour and that there are no current plans etc etc. To which my obvious response was to wonder why they would be so keen to say this…

And looking through the survey you can see why. Because the questions about the impact of possible future changes were about making Oyster either less widely usable or more expensive. So of course it could well be true that there are no precise plans for restricting Oyster or raising its prices at the moment, but it’s still a pretty pointed choice to be only researching those options – and not, for example, to be asking if I would make more use of other transport options if Oyster started applying to them (e.g. if it started being usable to pay at certain car parks) or if it became generally a more useful card by being usable in shops.

Overall the survey was rather amateurish in its execution (or perhaps the compiler had an unfortunate experience with an apostrophe early in life and so now is allergic to using them?), with a love of the gratuitous acronym and plenty of jargon thrown around in the way that really good survey setters avoid in surveys aimed at the general public.

So at best I’m unimpressed at the low-quality of the survey and at worst I fear the questions in it reveal rather more than the survey setters intended, disclaimer notwithstanding.


Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in London.


  • How could they make the Oyster LESS usable??
    If anything it should be extended to the Barclay bikes and, like most cities in the world, should allow to change transport mode without paying extra (as in you should pay a flat fee per zone, wherever you go from train to tube to bus).
    As for more expensive? we already have one of the most expensive transport system in the world.

  • “perhaps the compiler had an unfortunate experience with an apostrophe early in life”

    …än åpøströphë bit my sister œnce…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Andy Daer
    As we know, Johnson didn't get Brexit done, and didn't handle Covid "fine". In his Today interview he said the real problem is the media; if only they would st...
  • Helen Dudden
    If a seat can be bought in the House of Lords, where is the value of that seat? I've been to Westminster on several occasions and always been checked on the...
  • David Evans
    Jeff, you say "Perhaps not, but it is unreasonable to [seek a pay increase that compensates for the effect of inflation] and retain absurdly archaic working pra...
  • Chris Moore
    @Peter Martin: An economically and mathematically challenged individual might conclude from your intervention that UK GDP per capita was higher in 2007 - 50k...
  • John Medway
    Thanks all for your comments. @William Francis - Yes, although GDP isn't in my view "almost everything", it still has its uses. A precipitate fall in GDP wou...