Poll hints hung parliament could be vote winner

As the election draws closer and the polls seem firmly stuck in or near hung-parliament territory, the latest Guardian/ICM poll suggests that the prospect of no one party having an absolute majority isn’t scaring voters as much as Labour and the Conservatives might like.

As the Guardian reports:

Voters remain unconvinced by the Conservative alternative, with 29% thinking a clear Tory victory would be best. Only 18% think Britain would be best served by a strong Labour win this spring. Both groups are outnumbered by the 44% who want a hung parliament in which the government works with smaller parties such as the Liberal Democrats.

Accepting all the caveats about individual polls and not knowing exactly how the questions were asked, it’s striking that about a third of Labour and Tory voters would seem not to want their party of choice to win an outright majority (or not know whether they do or not).

Might it be that the public really is ready for a hung parliament; and, if so, can the Lib Dems turn it to their advantage and persuade more people that a vote for the Lib Dems is a positive choice for change, not a wasted vote?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • I hope the public understand what a hung Parliament is. It doesn’t mean MPs will be hanged if they abuse the expenses system..

  • The Lib Dems need to communicate to this 44% that in hundreds of seats voting Lib Dem is makes a hung parliament more likely, or at least does no harm.  However, in the 150 key Lab-Con contests voting Lib Dem is not the best way of blocking a Commons majority.  In the micro marginals of these 150, the Tories must be backed to remove Brown’s majority.  But in the others Labour need support to prevent a Cameron/Osborne majority replacing it.

  • Roger – you could be onto something there !

    Seriously – expect a shed load more FUD about a balanced parliament.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Pawel Urbanski
    Where I grew up in Poland, school lessons finished at 3, but there was optional supervised care until 5 or 6, often just run in the library, for the parents who...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Chloe, "Who picks up the tab for the net fiscal deficit of the Scottish & Welsh governments " You're absolutely right that it should be t...
  • Tony Vickers
    @Tom Reeve you sort of get it but lets be specific how we'd pay for raising the income tax threshold. We would tax the annual rental value of land. Its been our...
  • cim
    Matt (Bristol): for single-member AV it's not terrible, but most ways of including it in multi-member STV break the proportional representation aspect very badl...
  • Rif Winfield
    Jack, you are absolutely right, as were Tom Ellis and the young David Lloyd George. The tragedy of the Newport meeting in January 1896 was that it set back the ...