Pollwatch – State of the Leaders: Clegg +34%, Cameron +38% (June 2010)

Yesterday, Pollwatch looked at the state of the parties in June; today it’s the turn of the coalition government leaders.

As with all polls, what follows comes with caveats. Only two polling companies – YouGov and Mori – this past month asked questions specifically to find out the public’s views of the Lib Dem and Tory party leaders. (Harriet Harman’s performance as Labour leader is not being measured). And each asks variants on the basic question – do you think Clegg/Cameron are doing a good job – to come up with their figures, so comparison ain’t easy. But, still, we don’t indulge in polls that often, so here goes …

Here, in chronological order, are the results of the five polls published in June asking for the public to rate the two governing party leaders:

    Cameron: 63% approve, 16% disapprove: net +47%
    Clegg: 61%, 20%, +41%
    (3-4 June, YouGov: Do you think (name) is doing well or badly as (position)?)

    Cameron: 60% approve, 19% disapprove: net +41%
    Clegg: 59%, 21%, +38%
    (10-11 June, YouGov: Do you think (name) is doing well or badly as (position)?)

    Cameron: 57% satisfied, 26% dissatisfied: net +31%
    Clegg: 53%, 27%, +26%
    (18-20 June, Mori: Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way X is doing his job as Y?)

    Cameron: 64% approve, 20% disapprove: net +44%
    Clegg: 62%, 22%, +40%
    (17-18 June, YouGov: Do you think (name) is doing well or badly as (position)?)

    Cameron: 61% approve, 27% disapprove, net +34%
    Clegg: 57%, 30%, +27%
    (24-25 June, YouGov: Do you think (name) is doing well or badly as (position)?)

Which gives us an average net popularity – and, yes, I know how unscientific such averages are – compared with May’s as follows:

    Nick Clegg +34% (-2%), David Cameron +38% (+5%)

Nick Clegg cedes his lead as most popular party leader – a lead he has held for many months – to David Cameron. Nick’s average net rating of +34% is highly respectable, and well ahead of his position before the election was called. Some 80-90% of the public have formed a view of him, and by a roughly 2:1 margin this appears to be favourable … so far.

It is Mr Cameron’s ratings, though, which have surged since the election, with some 60% of the public approving of his performance to date, and only around one-fifth disapproving. For a Tory Prime Minister, these are quite remarkable figures – I think we’d have to go back almost two decades, to the start of John Major’s premiership, to find any equivalent ratings. So far, it seems, the public are liking what they see of Mr Cameron, perhaps to both his and their surprise.

It would be interesting to see what the public is making of Harriet Harman as Labour leader – is her strident, oppositional posturing winning her friends in the wider country? But as she’s not a contender for the permanent post, clearly no pollsters feel its worth asking the question. We shall have to make do instead (I hope) with polls comparing the relative popularities of their five candidates for leader.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

2 Comments

  • I don’t think most people will even know that Harriet Harman is acting leader.

    You have to remember that these polls are before your government has done anything and when everything is presented as the best case scenario by your government. It’s a lot easier to say that your policies will work when there are only academics questioning you, a lot harder after the fact when you have to justify what you have done.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Le Grice
    Throwing one's hands up and saying that voters always had trouble knowing what we stand for is really missing the wood for the trees. As a smaller party that's ...
  • David Sparrow
    Interesting and thoughtful article in the Guardian online, I agree now is not the time the only beneficiaries will be the Tories and Labour but Ed does need to ...
  • Peter Davies
    The Labour Party has been remarkably unsuccessful at excluding the middle class. They have the second most middle class membership of any major party (The Green...
  • Tristan Ward
    @ Jason Conner "But there are some very wealthy upper middle class people on this site by the looks of things and I am not one of them. " Are you suggesti...
  • Tristan Ward
    @ David Raw Historically, Tristan, when the party moved to the right (2010-15) the consequence was that the number of Lib Dem M.P.’s dropped from 57 in 201...