Public poll says Cable for Chancellor – how to bank this in real votes?

Vince Cable is the public’s preferred choice for Chancellor, according to a poll by PoliticsHome.

Of the general public polled, 31% chose Vince Cable above George Osborne, Alistair Darling, Ken Clarke, Peter Mandelson and Ed Balls.

The poll also found that 79% of Liberal Democrat voters supported Vince Cable for the job, while Osborne and Darling received much lower levels of support from their own parties’ voters. (Find the full results at PoliticsHome.)

As Iain pointed out yesterday, Vince’s recent recce to the Treasury does raise questions about how he could land the job.

Of course, national polls like this don’t determine who gets to be Chancellor, but it’s a reminder that the public are aware of the Liberal Democrats’ particular strength in this area. It’s up to local campaigners to translate this into support at the poll that really counts – the General Election.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • The funny part of this poll was that the most ruthelessly ambitious of the lot, young Ed Balls, scored a magnificant 2%

  • @ Undecided

    Hahahahaha well spotted.

    Thing is, a coalition situation with Cable in any post is difficult – Chancellor and he’s more senior than Clegg, who presumably wouldn’t get to Also take one of the big three. Meanwhile, Cable to a more junior economic post like Chief Sec or BERR would be ridiculous when the more senior position is taken by Osborne. The only solution to the conundrum is to put Clarke in as Chancellor, Cable at either Chief Sec or BERR (i’d go with BERR) and Clegg’s requested position at the Home Office, or maybe education. I still think that would look odd, and i also don’t know if i see the Tories agreeing to it, given how much a) giving the Lib Dems the Home Office would enrage the party faithful, and b) Michael Gove would be seriously pissed off not to get the education brief he probably feels rightly entitled to, given how much solid work he’s put in for it, and how credible he’s made the Tories look on education (though naturally i don’t think he’s wholly sound on it).

    Ultimately, i don’t see the Lib Dems doing a deal with the Tories of that nature.

  • Leader of the Commons is an important job to have as it gives you a lot of power to change the way things are done (which is as important as policy agreements)

  • Malcolm Wall 18th Apr '10 - 10:32pm

    @Leo, all of what you post is predicated on a huge assumption and as the only ballot that counts has yet to be cast we must view your output as specious waffle to be candidly blunt.

    btw Gove proffering failed Scandinavian “solutions” to the education situation has done nothing to rehabilitate the tories wrt education. The contents of their policy portfolio seems to quickly unravel when given even the slightest scrutiny. Big Society is quite frankly B.S.

    If there is a balanced parliament then it should create a short lived national government and quickly reform the voting system to resemble something that looks like a selection procedure fit for a modern pluralist democracy. Then the system will actually allow the population to decide the nature of our government rather than have a minority elected dictatorship as we have had for the last thirty plus years.

  • Well you’re entitled to think that, Mr Wall, but i was merely observing that a coalition scenario throws up a whole load of problems for the party.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Martin 7th Jul - 3:38am
    @ Joseph Bourke, "..... just as the 1906-1914 administration was the high point for the Liberal Party in the 20th Century." I'm not sure many...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 7th Jul - 2:01am
    @ JoeB, You shouldn't believe everything you read in the Murdoch press! The UBI has not "united left and right". It is important to appreciate...
  • User AvatarGordon 7th Jul - 12:23am
    David - Sorry I wasn't clear. I didn't mean leapfrog in seats but in in terms of setting the agenda/seizing the intellectual high ground. Votes...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 7th Jul - 12:16am
    The Times carried an article recently headlined 'Coronavirus has united left and right on universal basic income.' "It’s a rare day that the far left...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 6th Jul - 10:31pm
    @ Gordon "But by the same token a perfectly achievable improvement in the Lib Dem’s performance would see them leapfrog the Conservatives". I agree about...
  • User AvatarJames Belchamber 6th Jul - 10:04pm
    @Mike Read: