Pugh sticks up for posties sacked for not wearing cycle helmets

The Express has the story:

ROYAL Mail bosses were branded draconian yesterday after sacking three postmen in a week – for not wearing cycle helmets. They were accused of adhering rigidly to ­guidelines to cut staff and slash costs ahead of ­privatisation. Many others also face disciplinary action ­following the clampdown in Southport, Merseyside. Several have launched an appeal to be re-instated. Father-of-two David Smith was dismissed after 17 years.

Southport Lib Dem MP John Pugh believes the posties have been treated unfairly:

The only one at risk for not wearing a helmet is the postman himself – so why is the Royal Mail threatening disciplinary action?”

A Royal Mail spokesman blandly averred: “We take the safety of employees ­very seriously.”

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

11 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 27th Jun '09 - 10:49am

    They’re going to claim it’s setting a bad example for the public, which is bad for their corporate image. Not going to win this one. Better be careful it doesn’t backfire.

  • Martin Kinsella 27th Jun '09 - 11:37am

    thanks for your input Chris.

    Excuse me for not giving a damn.

  • The evidence is that if you wear a helmet, you are more likely to get knocked off because other vehicles give you less space (see work by researchers at the University of Bath – who found you were safest wearing a blond wig). Good luck to these posties!

  • Richard Burton 28th Jun '09 - 7:11am

    Nowhere with a helmet law or massive increase in wearing due to an advertising campaign has been able to show any reduction in risk. Yes, cycling deaths fall, but the number of cyclists falls by more, so the risk actually increases. Including New Zealand Chris, but don’t be ashamed about being gullible, lots of people believe that helmets are effective, but not the ones who’ve looked at the evidence.

    The Royal Mail introduced the helmet rule, with the support of the union, not as a safety measure, but as a uniform rule for cycling postmen. Before they did so, they commissioned a report about helmets from the Transport Research Laboratory, which they refused to publish. They still haven’t published it. Has any other postmen been dismissed for a uniform rule infringement?

    Check out http://www.cyclehelmets.org

  • stuart austin 29th Jun '09 - 10:46am

    I should point out that Managers at Royal Mail can be tken to court and be given a heavy fine for not ensuring that staff wear the appropriate protection.

  • Filippo Negroni 15th Apr '10 - 11:40pm

    What really astounds me is that helmets are made compulsory, and some poor misguided fool even apparently battled to force Royal Mail to issue them to cycling postmen, yet I see no mention of sending them on to a Bikeability Level 3 course or making Cyclecraft compulsory reading nor supply said book free of charge.
    Yet Cyclecraft and Bikeability are both existing government sponsored initiatives valid for all who cycle.
    What a waste of effort and money.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 31st Mar - 3:55pm
    @ Nigel Jones " I have occasionally worried that in conference, decisions have been voted on where few people have read the policy paper and...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 31st Mar - 3:55pm
    I wouldn't blame the police for this. The communication from Government has been confusing and unclear. In the Easter egg example, it appears just a...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 31st Mar - 3:53pm
    Lets have some Facts. Its not 6% in the latest PollS, its 6% in the latest Poll, just one Poll out of the 14 Polls...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 31st Mar - 3:34pm
    Disagree. Ed Davey is clearly a top contender should he choose to stand. Not saying it should definitely be him, but he should be allowed...
  • User AvatarSteve Griffiths 31st Mar - 3:15pm
    We need to be doing something and be seen to be doing something. I have a great deal of respect for Ed Davie; a competent...
  • User AvatarNigel Jones 31st Mar - 2:49pm
    Let's think outside the box; is there an opportunity here to involve more members, spread knowledge and thinking more widely and help members spread the...
Mon 27th Apr 2020