The headline pretty much says it all: as promised in the coalition document, the government is moving towards ending the detention of children for immigration purposes.
As a result, the UK Border Agency is running a consultation, which closes on 1 July. You can find out more and submit your views via the UKBA website. Although the political commitment is clear, there are plenty of details still to be worked out, as the review document explains. So if it is an area you have some knowledge of, make sure you submit your views by 1 July.
4 Comments
If this is true: http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE65N29D20100624 , then I’m annoyed. Theresa May’s first misstep. At least the 28 day period of detention without charge is to be renewed for a period of six months only, but nevertheless there is no justification for it in the first place.
David Davis, as usual, is to be praised for upholding decent British liberal (small ‘l’) values and standing up for the rights of habeus corpus and the right to defend oneself against known charges and evidence in a trial before a jury of ones peers:
Sadly, it would appear that Theresa May, who did oppose 90 days detention without trial when presented to parliament by the last government, is not sufficiently convinced of the rights of the individual against arbitrary detention by the Crown.
Surely this is an issue to unite MPs around the flag of Liberal Democracy, regardless of whatever economic arguments are raging? I urge the Liberal Democratic party in parliament to let its displeasure over this be heard. They should seek Tory support, which is likely to be considerable, in voicing their displeasure.
I have to declare myself to have a very cynical view regarding the timing of this announcement during the all the furore over the budget and the discreet way in which the announcement would appear to have been made.
I am concerned that this practice is merely being “reviewed”, with the implication that the detention of children may not be ended, and quickly. The coalition agreement states categorically (section 17) “We will end the detention of children for immigration purposes.”
There have been several reviews of this practice, and of the harm it causes. See this report by Bail for Immigration Detainees 18 months ago.
I urge UKBA to recommend the immediate cessation of detention of children. Reasonable and humane alternatives to such detention can be reviewed and implemented thereafter with as much despatch as the agency can accomplish. The risk, such as it is, of a small number of absconsions in the interim does not justify extending by a single day the harm being done to children by the current policy.
I have emailed the UKBA consultation team and Nick Clegg to this effect and would encourage others to do so.
Obviously, there’s a stop-bold missing somewhere from there. (Sheesh.)
I AM REALLY HAPPY THAT THEY WANT TO END CHILDREN DETENTION, MY OPINION IS TO ALLOW FAMILIES WHO ARE BEEN IN UK FOR LONG LIKE 5 YERAS UPWARD BECAUSE THEY ALREALDY BUILD STABLE LIFE IN UK.