Richard Foord tables bill on wild camping in national parks

Dartmoor was the only area of England and Wales where under a local law there had been an assumed right to wild camp without the landowner’s permission. However a High Court judge ruled earlier this month that this was legally wrong and permission was needed. That affects not only casual wild campers but also schemes such as the Duke of Edinburgh awards scheme.

A limited agreement for camping access with some landowners on has been agreed. But concern remains that an already restricted right of access to camp is being restricted further. Following the decision, wild camping outside of a designated campsite without the landowner’s permission is no longer legal anywhere in England and Wales.

Yesterday, Richard Foord, MP for Tiverton and Honiton, tabled a bill in the House of Commons – the National Parks (Camping) Bill.


Speaking to Devon media, Richard Foord said:

The recent ruling on Dartmoor has seen rights we’ve enjoyed for decades put at risk. Thousands of people every year travel to Dartmoor to responsibly enjoy our beautiful part of the world.

It should not be the case that a very small minority of wealthy landowners get to remove access to National Parks, or to make it conditional on being paid.

At a time when the Dartmoor National Park Authority is already experiencing financial pressure, taxpayers’ money should be spent supporting Dartmoor and protecting our countryside – not paying wealthy landowners for access. My Bill will maintain people’s legal right to wild camp responsibly on Dartmoor and access National Park land.

I urge the Government to allow it to be debated, so that MPs can discuss the impact of the ruling and take action to rectify the situation. I will also continue to push for action to tackle the irresponsible use of disposable barbeques, which continue to blight our National Parks.

The bill will receive its second reading on Friday, 14 March.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Inspired thinking. I did Ten Tors for many years in 1970s. I do agree that somehow the litter problem needs solving but denying the right to kids to have an adventure is wrong. I have been fighting mild autism all my life so the fresh air did wonders. Not the blisters though.

  • So what does this mean for all the homeless with tents on roundabouts or tucked away in green spaces around supermarkets? Also the various protest camps that arise from time-to-time.

    This judgement has far reaching implications. Suspect we probably need a national mass trespasswildcamp event, given Extinction Rebellion organised the This Land is Our Land event in recognition of the 1932 mass tresspass on Kinder Scout, perhaps the LibDems should support them in this…

  • Any mass littering after any wildcamp protest would be good news for the landowners. Beware of what you wish for.

  • Toby Kibble 1st Apr '23 - 2:29pm

    Thank you for making a stand on this – I was going to sign your petition, but lost the form.
    You have my full support. My son did the Ten Tors – 35, 45 and 55 miles and my youngest daughter is on her mock ten Tors as I write.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Martin Gray
    I see that the Western liberal democracies are gearing up for some more sanctions to be imposed on Iran for firing those obsolete missile and drones in retaliat...
  • Tim Leunig
    There are two classes of children at the moment - those whose parents smoke - often in doors, at home, and those whose parents do not. Why would we want to allo...
  • Geoff Reid
    Charles is quite right. With all due respect to East Cambridgeshire doing what we might hope they would do, the Farnham result is very, very encouraging. Comin...
  • Katharine Pindar
    @ David Raw. Hi, David, you are quite right to draw attention again to the two -child limitation and the benefit cap, which are helping to keep many families in...
  • David Blake
    @Duncan Greenland. It would be better if it was just one sequence by candidate name, with an index by constituency. As it is there is duplication and a degree...