Sally Hamwee explains why she’s introducing her Missing Persons Guardianship Bill

Yesterday, Sally Hamwee introduced her Private Members’ Bill which would enable guardianship orders to be made for missing people so that their affairs could be managed.

Earlier she wrote for the Missing People website:

With no legal system for managing a missing person’s affairs, they can fall into disarray with disconcerting speed.  Salaries may stop being paid into a bank account, but direct debits, mortgage payments and rent will continue to be paid out – until the funds run out.  However sympathetic a bank may be, it needs the signature of its account holder to change arrangements. Some may even regard themselves as unable to provide information.

Once you grasp the legal position, you can begin to see the practical impact.  You can’t use the missing person’s money to pay his rent and other bills.   You can’t sell a house which is in your and your missing husband’s joint names, but because your family’s circumstances have changed neither can you afford the mortgage.

And once you see the practical impact, you begin to get some idea of the emotional effect.  A wife explained that she went overnight “from being a couple and having two wages to … becoming a single mum who could only work part time, with a mortgage and bills to pay…. my husband was missing, and that in itself was traumatic enough, but there was still the everyday living to do as well.”  A mother put it, “I know it sounds so petty in the great scheme of what’s happened, but I didn’t want my son’s account to go overdrawn.  It mattered so much to me.”

Guardianship would enable the families of missing people to manage their property and affairs.  It would be welcome to financial institutions; they need legal certainty.  It would be a minimal cost to the public purse.  It could benefit thousands of families.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Sadie Smith 16th Jun '16 - 8:13am

    What a sensible proposal from Sally.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 31st May - 11:27am
    Peter, thank you for your useful contributions. On Cummings, I do think he broke the guidance rules with impunity (it's never yet mentioned that he...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 31st May - 11:26am
    @ George Kendall, If neoliberals had an explanation for the "productivity puzzle", why would they call it a 'puzzle' in the first place? It's really...
  • User AvatarGlenn 31st May - 11:16am
    The lockdowns have not saved lives. In fact the old and the vulnerable they were supposed to protect were turfed out of hospitals to clear...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 31st May - 10:58am
    @ Glenn, I agree that Govt policy hasn't been optimal. With the benefit of hindsight we should have closed the borders in February, and had...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 31st May - 10:47am
    @Joseph Bourke I agree with a lot of what you say above. I've often read of the "productivity puzzle" of the UK. Do you have...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 31st May - 10:33am
    @ Anthony Watts, the EU thinks we should: "...Pursue fiscal policies aimed at achieving....prudent medium-term fiscal positions and ensuring debt sustainability.... while enhancing investment etc...