Scottish Lib Dem conference: your LDV reader

On Saturday, LDV reported the news that the Scottish Lib Dems were uniting behind leader Tavish Scott’s opposition to the SNP referendum on independence, ahead of a special private conference for party members. And so it came to pass, as the BBC reports:

Tavish Scott has consistently opposed a referendum, but some divisions within the party have emerged and the issue was debated in a closed session at the party’s autumn conference in Dunfermline, Fife, on Saturday.

Senior Lib Dem MSP Ross Finnie, who has been asked to lead a consultation with members about the party’s stance, said the session had agreed a united position.

He said: “What was very clear – and maybe a little surprising – was that the conference was having no truck with the SNP’s referendum bill. That couldn’t have been clearer and therefore there is no change, and there is no wish for a change to the position the leader has been taking.

“There is however an issue about going forward beyond 2011, as to whether looking at the constitutional questions, there are issues around how you might frame, how you might produce a different question and different type of referendum.”

The BBC’s Brian Taylor offers an excellent analysis of the meaning behind the Scottish Lib Dems’ decision here:

Two outcomes [of the conference]. One, support for [Tavish Scott’s] position that the LibDems should oppose current SNP plans for a plebiscite. Two, the beast that is internal dissent within the LibDems has probably been sated for a while. …

… opposing a referendum is, politically, a very uncomfortable place to be. Hence “bring it on” from Wendy Alexander. Hence the LibDems closed doors discussion in Dunfermline. … [the party’s] position is much more nuanced than straightforward opposition to Mr Salmond’s Bill. Of that, they say it is at the wrong recessionary time – and with the wrong question (a mandate to negotiate rather than a blunt Yes or No to independence.)

At Dunfermline, we are told that the issue was canvassed, that there were voices raised for a referendum. But, when Ross Finnie summed up by saying that opposition to the Salmond plan appeared overwhelming in the hall, there was no dissent. That position carried the day by acclaim.

The whole post – including the four nuances of the Scottish Lib Dems’ position – is well worth reading in full.

A number of Scottish Lib Dem bloggers also offered their own thoughts on the conference – here are links to their posts. (As ever, if I’ve missed any, do please email me at [email protected], or link to your post in the comments thread, below).

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Scotland.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 11th Dec - 2:30am
    James Baillie, Our policy is to “introduce a pilot scheme that involve(s) an unconditional payment of the standard Universal Credit allowance (currently £319 per month...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Dec - 1:01am
    @ Dennis Wake I suppose that is one theory. Another might be that the cost of nurses, doctors and teachers does rise as GDP rises....
  • User AvatarRoss McLean 11th Dec - 12:27am
    @Caron - I bet you enjoyed doing that. :) Parliament would be a less colourful place without the legend that is Jamie Stone. I hope...
  • User AvatarMichael 1 11th Dec - 12:18am
    If I have got this right then these are the seats the MRP model have us losing to the Tories (up to 20%) with the...
  • User AvatarRoss McLean 10th Dec - 11:56pm
    I don't think these debates have had any significant impact on this election. There have been too many, and once it was established that leaders...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 10th Dec - 11:51pm
    @Ross That is exactly what I mean! Now amended.
Tue 7th Jan 2020