Changes coming to Scottish Parliament election rules

The Scottish Parliament (Elections etc.) Order 2010 has been tabled in Parliament this week bringing about changes in the law for the Scottish Parliament elections. As it is a Statutory Instrument (SI) it cannot be amended – either it gets Parliamentary approval or it is rejected outright. It is extremely rare for an SI to be rejected and there are no signs that this one will be in that class.

The main changes people can therefore expect for the next Scottish Parliament elections are:

  • Scottish ParliamentThe rules controlling donations to Scottish Parliament constituency candidates will now be the same as those for Westminster Parliament candidates.
  • There is now a “long campaign” period in which the expenses of constituency candidates are controlled, again as with Westminster Parliament elections.
  • The “minimum period” between the dissolution of the Scottish Parliament and the day of poll has been increased from 21 to 28 days, in line with the recommendations from the Gould report.
  • The rules have been amended to also allow grandparents or grandchildren to assist a person with disabilities to vote at a polling station.
  • The rules have been amended to reflect the transfer of responsibility for the storage of election documents, including marked registers, from Sheriff Clerks to constituency returning officers. Similar changes have already been made for Westminster Parliament elections.
Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law and Scotland.
Advert

3 Comments

  • John Richardson 27th Oct '10 - 9:58pm

    Is it really necessary to change the layout of the entire website when clicking on a post to do with election law? I don’t think it adds anything and is quite annoying.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Steve Trevethan
    Thank you for a bravely honest article! Might the “leadership” which took the L. D party into enforced student debts/loans have been confused about the i...
  • David Le Grice
    Weird that this appears to be the first LDV article about this, and the first time anyone in the parliamentary party has spoken up about it (as far as I'm aware...
  • Jack
    Delighted to see conference overwhelmingly reject the EHRC guidance (they don't deserve three quarters of that name - I accept they are a commission). People ar...
  • Geoff Reid
    Somebody had to say it eventual!y. Thank you Tom for inviting us to be honest on this matter....
  • Hywel
    Important point there Paul. For all the angst about 'lack of cut through' that has pretty much been the case for most of the time the LIb Dems existed except f...