Sex education motion leads to National Assembly wifi ban for Welsh Lib Dem website

Talking about sex can lead to internet filters having a bit of a hissy fit.

A very sensible IR Cymru motion on sex education has meant that the Welsh Lib Dem website, where it appears on the Conference agenda. The Daily Post has the details:

Just hours before the rally to kick start their annual conference the party’s website has been barred by the bulding’s public wi-fi.

It has been placed in the same category of proscribed sites along with hard core porn sites.

But it has emerged the reason for the block is that the conference programme mentions the word “sex” or “sexual” 18 times.

The policy motion – named “let’s talk about sex” – includes calls for parents’ legal right to remove their child from any part of sex education classes to be binned.

The Lib Dem who proposed the sex and relationships education motion, Cadan ap Tomos, said it seemed the Assembly found the Lib Dem conference “too much to handle”.

Followers on twitter reacted to the image, with one man tweeting “saucy lib dems!” another put “I dread to think”.

The motion will be debated at noon tomorrow.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • @Dave Page
    Note the last sentence of the Daily Post article: “The block has now been lifted.”

    It is actually possible to configure these filters so that they don’t block sex education information, and this has been done.

  • Thomas Shakespeare 6th Feb '16 - 5:29pm

    Yes Stuart but it has to be done on a case by case basis. That’s unworkable and unrealistic.

  • @Thomas
    I don’t agree it’s unworkable and unrealistic. We have a real example here of where it has worked. Another example would be the IWF list, which is not perfect but does a good job of stopping casual browsers from accessing things we’d all want them not to.

    The sex education argument against filters is a weak one. Exactly how long would it take to construct a whitelist of – say – the 1,000 most accessed sex education sites? I would suggest not very.

    The surprising thing about this case is that the Welsh Assembly filter was not already set up to whitelist all Lib Dem websites!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMike Read 19th Jan - 3:16pm
    Given that in Sept. Tory remainers such as Boris brother Jo, Amber Rudd & Rory Stewart walked out of the party, Lib Dems rightly had...
  • User AvatarAndrew 19th Jan - 3:15pm
    @Jeff I am sure your stats are all correct. But what is your point? Your numbers show we are trading well with the world as...
  • User AvatarWilliam Francis 19th Jan - 2:41pm
    We should have done more to retain our level of support for at the start of the election, which mainly came from former Labour voting...
  • User AvatarFrank West 19th Jan - 2:21pm
    I wanted to remain but quite happy with Boris as PM, the Labour alternative was just too frightful to allow, more McD than Corbyn, letting...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 19th Jan - 2:03pm
    The reason we failed to win over more Remain Voters was the same whether they were Tory or Labour, we simply werent big enough to...
  • User AvatarDavid Becket 19th Jan - 1:18pm
    I thank everybody who has commented and I will try and answer some of the points. We will need to get uncomfortable messages over, or...