Should the report of a Prime Minister’s speech be 42% journalist talking?

That’s how Nick Robinson’s piece for BBC TV on Gordon Brown’s speech to Labour Party conference broke down. The 4 minute 50 second piece was 42% Nick Robinson speaking, and only 58% Sarah or Gordon Brown speaking.

Add to that the preceeding and suceeding segments – more BBC journalists and presenters talking about the speech – and what you are left with is reporting largely made up of journalists talking about what someone else has said.

Some context and analysis is certainly useful and interesting – but should Nick Robinson have really taken up 42% of the core piece of coverage rather than actually giving us more of the event that he was reporting on, especially when he was both preceeded and suceeded by other BBC staff talking to camera about the speech too?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Was he pro-Brown (a la Marr) in his report?

  • neil bradbury 24th Sep '08 - 11:59am

    I would have to say that I disagree with the comments posted. Maybe in the past journalists were too reverential to politicians but now I think the media assumes all politics needs to be spoon fed to us.

    Rather than listening to what people have to say, we hear more and more about plots and backstabbing. I wish I was allowed to analise the speeches myself by listening to more of them. I know that at times the analysis is written before the speech is even published and at LD conference I am sick of journalists “analysing” speeches with very bizarre stories.

    A few years ago, I remember Sky News doing a piece to camera after a rally that was portraying us as giving the leader a muted reception when nothing could have been further from the truth.

  • Of course 42% Nick Robinson was appropriate !!!

    Haven’t you realised that the presenters/ analysts ARE the story?

    And that the role of News is not to tell us things that have happened, but to speculate what MIGHT happen; and then when something DOES happen, to speculate on what MIGHT happen NEXT !

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEthicsgradient 13th Dec - 1:39pm
    Hi, I had said it many times, people had not changed their view on brexit and the country wanted to leave. Lin Dems have every...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 13th Dec - 1:38pm
    A welcome back to Jennie ! The new Co-Leadership sounds like a good idea. This article is full of good ideas. Can I defend Mark...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 13th Dec - 1:35pm
    @David Beckett So the answer is to “clear the conference decks” is it? Just a minute, it’s not ‘Conference’ that the Lib Dems need -...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 13th Dec - 1:35pm
    @ frankie, "Hatred" is too strong a word. However, there is a strong dislike of being talked down to by, (many erstwhile) Labour voters in...
  • User AvatarPatrick 13th Dec - 1:33pm
    Actually this election was a great success compared to the GE 2017. The Lib Vote increased from 7.4% to 11,5%. Increasing the share of popular...
  • User AvatarJeremy Cunnington 13th Dec - 1:33pm
    There are, understandably a number of negative comments above for the campaign, some of them justified eg on revoke, some of them not. Remain alliance...
Tue 7th Jan 2020