I suspect most politicians have used the “it’s a hypothetical question” reason to avoid answering a question. Over at Slate there’s an interesting piece praising Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama for his enthusiasm in answering hypotheticals, which very much sets him out from the crowd.
Hat tip: Comment Central.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
The defence of International Law in an age of impunity (John Kelly)
Social care and the triple lock (Gordon Lishman)
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
Ukraine‘s plight means UK must rearm for war now, and not by ten years’ time (George Cunningham)
Observations of an Expat: Ukraine in Trouble (Tom Arms)
The Joy of Six 1593
Do shouty politicians gain long term votes?
Captain Beefheart and his Magic Band: Autumn's Child
Farage let off Reform staffer accused of racist slur
Stalling an Ambush and protecting more than the countryside
Mozart died in 1791. Neil Young believes one 1960s songwriter has the same immortality
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
An article for Lion & Unicorn: Malcolm Saville and the children's holiday adventure
paul barker 
David Allen 
Mick Taylor 
Andrew Tampion 
expats 
2 Comments
Some might say he’s slightly oer enthusiatic – he’s made several gaffs as a result of this not least coming out and saying that he wont use nuclear weapons ‘under any circumstances’ – which is certainly a welcome statement but not necessarily a sensible one for a future President of the United States.
I think that in answer to Mark’s point there are some that make sense to answer (for example, “If you were to have a vacancy for the Supreme Court who would you look to as a model Justice?”) and some, such as the nuclear question, that are probably best avoided for the reason Letterman hints at.
Giving too much detail in answer to hypotheticals though only risks offending your supporters. Obama is in a situation where it is in his interests to do so to show how different he is. No such benefit would be had for Hilary Clinton for instance (whose main appeal will be the “experienced and pragmatic” card).