So, why can’t you call yourself an MP?

The rules against people calling themselves an MP usually get a flurry of publicity in the run-up to a general election. Indeed, it’s part of the pre-election “Will it be an internet election this time?” tradition to have a story about how “MPs who use [insert currently fashionable internet tool] face disaster because they’ve called themselves an MP”.

This time round it’s been Twitter, with the story that MPs who have chosen a Twitter username containing “MP” will run into problems as they officially stop being MPs when Parliament is dissolved for a general election. So if they tweet during the campaign as if they were still an MP they would be breaking these rules. (This is different from, for example, local councillors – who continue to legally be councillors until several days after the election.)

There are three other regular parts of this tradition. First, the danger usually gets talked up at the expense of a cool look at the actual risks. In the case of Twitter, they are pretty minimal because you can change your name and back again (as I did).

Second, the Parliamentary authorities tend to get a bad rap. Although in other respects (Parliamentary footage on YouTube anyone?) Parliament hasn’t moved with the internet times, the rules about what MPs can do with websites, email addresses and the like have been regularly and sensibly updated ahead of each of the last few general elections.

But thirdly, there’s almost never any detail on exactly which rules an MP would be breaking. You can’t call yourself an MP if you’re not one. But what happens if you do?

In fact there isn’t a “You must be an MP to call yourself an MP” law. Parliament does make rules, however, for the conduct of its own members and for the protection of Parliamentary privilege.

These say that you can’t call yourself an MP if you aren’t one, with the possibility of the Committee on Standards and Privileges taking action if you break this rule.

For non-MPs, there is still the possibility of punishment as breaking the rules about calling yourself an MP could be judged a breach of Parliamentary privilege. Parliament has the power to punish non-MPs for such offences, though it has traditionally used them very cautiously.

There are also two laws under which someone might be prosecuted. First, there is law around fraud. Passing yourself off as an MP could constitute fraud, particularly if you did it in order to help win an election which then brings you a salary (i.e. financial gain).

Second, there is the broad electoral offence of “undue influence” which has been interpreted in some cases to mean cover providing false information to the electorate. It is not easy to pass the legal test for convicting under this offence and rightly so – given the need to protect freedom of speech. In particular, a prosecution would have to prove that identified individuals had been affected by the deceit. Simply saying “Someone said X and it isn’t true” is not enough.

In other words, it’s far from clear exactly what would happen if an MP called themselves an MP in some way. Where there are written instructions from the Parliamentary authorities, it is fair to expect MPs to follow them accurately – which, after all is what the rest of us have to do under many of the rules MPs make. But if someone accidentally stumbles into a minor problem area that isn’t explicitly covered by those instructions, then it makes sense not to get too excited.

Thank you to the House of Commons Information Office for answering a couple of queries from me.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Election law.


  • Your local candidate will probably be able to descirbe himself as “Leader of the Liberal Democrats”, Joe.

One Trackback

  • […] Media & PR What happens to MPs’ websites when Parliament is dissolved? Date: 12 March 2010 0 comments Tags: Online politics, Parliament, twitter, youtube There was a little flurry of interest last year as to whether MPs with “MP” in their Twitter name would face a problem after Parliament is officially dissolved for the general election. That’s because after that point technically no-one is an MP and you’re not allowed to call yourself an MP if you aren’t one. That story was rather over-played though it did spur me to dig out quite what the sanctions would be, which in turns out isn’t that simple a question to answer. […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    While I agree that we, Liberal Democrats are ‘along at the lower end of the polls at about 12% of the vote’ and ‘Reform UK and the Greens are lapping at (...
  • Alex Sabine
    Likewise, the increase in the budget deficit after 2001 was driven by domestic policy choices, not particularly by the external macro environment. The clear shi...
  • Alex Sabine
    In the late 1990s, yes there was the dotcom bubble but the economy as a whole was not growing unsustainably, and indeed the fears of a recession in 2001 proved ...
  • Alex Sabine
    @ Peter Martin Agreed that the context was different in the late 1960s, as we were still in the Bretton Woods system. However it remains the case that the bu...
  • Martin Gray
    @Mick Taylor...As regards legalising Cannabis ..We support the proposed smoking ban - that would lead to overtime someone in there 30s breaking the law if they ...