Southwark Council tries to ban people talking about what they’ve already talked about

Liberal Democrats in Southwark claim the council is £26 million pounds worse off because of decisions the Labour-run body has taken over a regeneration scheme for Elephant & Castle.

This figure has been the subject of political debate, it’s been mentioned in the council, it’s been mentioned in the press and it’s been mentioned online.

So what happened when Liberal Democrat councillors tried to put the figure in a motion to be debated at the council? The council said no – the figure is secret and can’t be mentioned.

As London SE1 reports:

A Southwark Council spokesperson said: “On the advice of the monitoring officer we removed commercially confidential information from public papers.”

Lib Dem councillors say that they believe that the censorship is politically motivated.

“This is an outrageous attempt by Labour to stop Liberal Democrat councillors speaking the truth,” says Cllr Geoffrey Thornton.

“The amount Labour lost through their incompetence is already in the public domain and for the council to try to maintain the fiction of secrecy is utterly ridiculous and pointless.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Local government, London and News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Selby Whittingham
    I recall Dennis at the regular Liberal dinners at the Manchester Reform Club in the late 1970s and also ran into him later at a London museum....
  • David Allen
    England fans would have been crazy to have carried Union Jacks to the World Cup. Scotland were also competing!...
  • Kevin Hawkins
    @Jana - Our vote decline in almost all of these elections is down to there being far more candidates standing. In some cases there were three or four extra part...
  • paul barker
    Unusually, there were 3 contests where Reform had stood before; in 2 of those their Vote fell. In both cases there seem to have been the same number of candidat...
  • Kevin Hawkins
    Here is my usual monthly summary of the last fifty local by-elections. Percentage Vote Share: Reform 24.24%, Labour 18.12%, Conservatives 17.52%, Liberal De...