Mark Pack

Southwark Council tries to ban people talking about what they’ve already talked about

By | Sun 17th October 2010 - 8:55 am

Liberal Democrats in Southwark claim the council is £26 million pounds worse off because of decisions the Labour-run body has taken over a regeneration scheme for Elephant & Castle.

This figure has been the subject of political debate, it’s been mentioned in the council, it’s been mentioned in the press and it’s been mentioned online.

So what happened when Liberal Democrat councillors tried to put the figure in a motion to be debated at the council? The council said no – the figure is secret and can’t be mentioned.

As London SE1 reports:

A Southwark Council spokesperson said: “On the advice of the monitoring officer we removed commercially confidential information from public papers.”

Lib Dem councillors say that they believe that the censorship is politically motivated.

“This is an outrageous attempt by Labour to stop Liberal Democrat councillors speaking the truth,” says Cllr Geoffrey Thornton.

“The amount Labour lost through their incompetence is already in the public domain and for the council to try to maintain the fiction of secrecy is utterly ridiculous and pointless.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Local government, London and News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tom Arms
    Will the teachers be paid more?...
  • Matt Wardman
    On Transport, there is currently a fascinating 3 year project for public transport starting up in the Peak District called "Hope Valley Mini Switzerland", which...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    Sean, a really good article. One part of this deserves more attention: what AI could mean for small businesses. Running a small company often means doing alm...
  • Jana
    I’m afraid I disagree with Douglas MacDonald and his idea of turning Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen into city-states. I believe a better model is to have a g...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "There also seems a reluctance to focus on the effect that AI will have on the distribution of income and wealth." Quite...