The Liberal Democrat run council in Stockport is trying to eliminate pointless jargon. Dizzy Thinks has the story, whilst I breathe a sigh of relief that I’ve only used one of the phrases on the hit list so far this week đ
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- Defining our future in Burnham Britain
- âPalestine should be run by Palestiniansâ so why wonât Britain reckon with what it did?
- Britain should confront history honestly, not selectively
- The Falklands are under threat again and we canât rely on America to save us
- Andy Burnham - new messiah or naughty boy?
Search
Op-eds
-
Burnham has left a gap on tax. We should run through it. (Tom Reeve)
-
Should the Liberal Democrats support “None of the Above”? (Samuel Jackson)
-
Extending the school day: A catalyst for economic growth (Edward Marsh)
-
An open letter to Andy Burnham (Tony Vickers)
-
Four challenges in Andy Burnham’s in-tray (Callum Robertson)
-
The Joy of Six 1552
-
Trump offended by key Burnham appointment
-
Alexander Mackendrick and Sweet Smell of Success
-
Clear the gallery!
-
RMT calls three one-day strikes over Midland Main Line safety
-
The first serving PM to receive the Legion of Honour?
-
Harry Chapin: W.O.L.D.
-
Will there be a general election?
-
Michelin-starred restaurateur faces jail for using ants as dessert garnish
-
Can Burnham win the endorsement of Number Ten's most important occupant?
Recent Comments
Tony Vickers
@Tom Reeve you sort of get it but lets be specific how we'd pay for raising the income tax threshold. We would tax the annual rental value of land. Its been our...
cim
Matt (Bristol): for single-member AV it's not terrible, but most ways of including it in multi-member STV break the proportional representation aspect very badl...
Rif Winfield
Jack, you are absolutely right, as were Tom Ellis and the young David Lloyd George. The tragedy of the Newport meeting in January 1896 was that it set back the ...
Diana Simpson
You would have a problem of public transport capacity to cope with kids going home in the rush hour(s) rather than before it. Our local buses are missed out whi...
Chloe
"We did use RON in single-winner STV / AV elections at my Students Union. But Iâm not sure I see it as constructive practical politics" That's where it sho...


11 Comments
Unfortunately, as someone in the comments has pointed out, they may not have done a good job of it.
This is an excellent idea. Anything that helps to make Council documents and webpages more accessible to the public can only be a good thing.
It’s very good to see SMBC thinking outside the box and going forward with this idea. đ
Nice to see a Lib Dem council pushing the envelope on this one đ
I’d say only the last item is an example of jargon- the rest are just management buzz-pharases.
Jagon is technical language for which there is a readily available plain english alternative. (Technical concepts that are more than a couple of words in everyday English are neither Jargon, nor buzzspeak).
Buzzwords are filler phrases that mean little and add nothing to the text. Unlike jargon, they do not render passages incomprehensible to most people, but they do make the writer look unimaginative, sheep like and foolish.
The barriers caused by buzzwords are purely in terms of psychology and paletability.
…but I rush to add, eliminating buzzwords is still a good thing.
I’m all for resizing the vocabulary envelope.
Mark #6: shurely downsizing?
I’ve also blogged about this by the way.
Who would have guess that such a post would produced a matrix-in response of milestone comments each acting as an enabler to the next huh?
Lib Dem Councillor in Southwark refuses to resign after drink driving conviction incurredd drunkenly from Council function. She is a Cabinet member. Council leader has backed her, but should she resign from the Council or from the Cabinet ?
http://icsouthlondon.icnetwork.co.uk/southlondonpress/southwark/tm_headline=ex-mayoress-banned-for-drink-driving%26method=full%26objectid=19555819%26siteid=50100-name_page.html
Most of these clichéd phrases are managementese, originate in the US (where else?), and I recoil instantly when I encounter them.
The point about jargon having precise technical meaning is well made.
To the layman, a “common mistake” is a mistake made frequently. To a lawyer, it is a mistake made by both parties to a contract.
Used incorrectly, legal jargon can be a menace.
The worst abuses of language are those inspired by ideology.
Like the use of “faith” when “religion” is meant – “faith” carrying the unspoken suggestion that adherence to religion is something virtuous and requiring to be shown “respect”.
One that really does infuriate me is the placing of “lesbians” before “gay men”, the assumption being that men are inherently wicked and should only be tolerated if they refrain from having sex with women. This dates from the days when the lunatic fringe of feminism was indulged by the left, and many gay rights activists were foolhardy enough to find common cause with it.
Oh, and I cannot resist mention of Comrade Enver Hoxha, one of the worst abusers of language ever to live. Here is his list of the enemies of socialist Albania: “The American imperialists, the Soviet and Chinese social imperialists, Titoite, Euro-Communist and other modern revisionists, the international capitalist bourgeoisie and reaction.”
#9: D&D is perfectly legitimate behaviour in Southwark. After all, it has been sanctioned by the Church of England.
I could say it is an ecumenical matter, but I won’t.