Tag Archives: bmj

LibLink: Nick Clegg: Why the Liberal Democrats believe a legal, regulated cannabis market would improve public health

Nick Clegg has been writing in the BMJ outlining our position on Cannabis.

He compares criminalisation of drugs to the prohibition of alcohol in the States:

Far from controlling and eliminating alcohol use, the “noble experiment” of prohibition drove users towards increasingly potent and dangerous drinks. With no regulatory levers in place except the threat of arrest (which had to be set against the promise of handsome profits for those who defied the law), there was no effective way to control the market. The ensuing public health crisis was one of the key motivations behind the repeal of prohibition in 1933, when President Roosevelt signed a new law allowing the sale of beer with a maximum alcohol content of 4%.

For spirits in 1926, read “skunk” in 2017. “Skunk” is a direct result of prohibition. New cultivation methods have pushed up potency over the past 20 years. Just as 1920s-era bootleggers didn’t bother to produce and smuggle high volume, low alcohol beer, so the illicit cannabis industry has responded to criminal enforcement by developing products that maximise profit, with no consideration for the health of its customers.

He goes on to talk about the merits of regulation:

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged , and | 4 Comments

Dr Evan Harris fisks: What is really at stake on the health reforms

On 8th April Norman wrote an interesting article here entitled “The NHS: safe in our hands”. That article is a good basis on which to discuss a few of the problems with the bill and the Government’s approach so far.

We should be clear that Norman Lamb is one of the good guys, who spotted earlier than most the problems with the White Paper and the Bill, and has been very clear that it requires radical surgery. He has also been particularly concerned, and this week expressed this publicly, that the pace of change is financially (and …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 23 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBarry Lofty 11th Aug - 1:08pm
    David: I am sure we could argue, discuss all that went on inside that coalition but I took it rather more personally at the time...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 11th Aug - 12:59pm
    Whilst we Lib Dems consider the Conservative government an enemy, because they hold different views to us, we depart from liberal principles. Liberals should respect...
  • User AvatarAndrew Toye 11th Aug - 12:55pm
    I agree that wellbeing should be a priority, but it’s one of those things that are difficult to measure or plan for. David Cameron introduced...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 11th Aug - 12:48pm
    Alex Macfie No Rose Gardens butters no parsnips. It's what they did that matters, the rest is froth.
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 11th Aug - 12:46pm
    @ Barry Lofty "The coalition served its main purpose, which was to save our economy in a time of financial meltdown". I'm sure that's what...
  • User AvatarRoland 11th Aug - 12:43pm
    But if we are honest, if you have racked up a dozen points, you are probably a bad driver. I take it from this that...