Tag Archives: bmj

LibLink: Nick Clegg: Why the Liberal Democrats believe a legal, regulated cannabis market would improve public health

Nick Clegg has been writing in the BMJ outlining our position on Cannabis.

He compares criminalisation of drugs to the prohibition of alcohol in the States:

Far from controlling and eliminating alcohol use, the “noble experiment” of prohibition drove users towards increasingly potent and dangerous drinks. With no regulatory levers in place except the threat of arrest (which had to be set against the promise of handsome profits for those who defied the law), there was no effective way to control the market. The ensuing public health crisis was one of the key motivations behind the repeal of prohibition in 1933, when President Roosevelt signed a new law allowing the sale of beer with a maximum alcohol content of 4%.

For spirits in 1926, read “skunk” in 2017. “Skunk” is a direct result of prohibition. New cultivation methods have pushed up potency over the past 20 years. Just as 1920s-era bootleggers didn’t bother to produce and smuggle high volume, low alcohol beer, so the illicit cannabis industry has responded to criminal enforcement by developing products that maximise profit, with no consideration for the health of its customers.

He goes on to talk about the merits of regulation:

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged , and | 4 Comments

Dr Evan Harris fisks: What is really at stake on the health reforms

On 8th April Norman wrote an interesting article here entitled “The NHS: safe in our hands”. That article is a good basis on which to discuss a few of the problems with the bill and the Government’s approach so far.

We should be clear that Norman Lamb is one of the good guys, who spotted earlier than most the problems with the White Paper and the Bill, and has been very clear that it requires radical surgery. He has also been particularly concerned, and this week expressed this publicly, that the pace of change is financially (and …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 23 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMartin 14th Dec - 10:55pm
    “The Lib Dems will have a period of difficult adjustment as some of the army of fervent Remainers melt away" Given a period of sustained...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 14th Dec - 10:21pm
    @Jon V "You ultimately need PR, and working with the next Labour government, whoever that is led by, is your best hope of getting it....
  • User Avatarfrankie 14th Dec - 10:21pm
    In which case William my local party should give up as there are few who match that definition locally. And yet they once ran the...
  • User AvatarMary Regnier-Wilson 14th Dec - 9:39pm
    I wonder how many of those commenting are basing there comments on actual evidence or just what they feel happened. Cos you know, we are...
  • User AvatarRob Lee 14th Dec - 9:37pm
    Whilst I see a number of people blaming or pointing fingers at the national party machine, we are a democratic party and those people don't...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 14th Dec - 9:17pm
    I like what Laura said on Any Questions.
Tue 7th Jan 2020