Tag Archives: bombardier

Steve Coltman

Opinion: Derby, Bombardier and lessons for Government

By Steve Coltman | Thu 19th January 2012 - 2:57 pm

The award of a £1.4bn contract to Bombardier’s rival Siemens seemed to threaten the existence of Britain’s last remaining train-maker. 1200 workers were being laid off by Bombardier with more losses in the supply chain. The award to Siemens was all the more galling as it followed statements by politicians of all parties saying how important it is that we boost our manufacturing sector.

Two salient points have emerged regarding the Labour Government’s tender process. Firstly, they set this up as a ‘Private Finance Initiative’ and secondly that they used the ‘Utilities Contract Regulations’ rather than the ‘Public Contracts Regulations’. Both …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 7 Comments
Andrew Cook

Opinion: Bombardier – the end is nigh?‏

By Andrew Cook | Tue 21st June 2011 - 1:41 pm

Just over a year ago, I wrote on Lib Dem Voice that the future for the Bombardier train building plant at Derby looked precarious. At that time, my fears were around the deep spending cuts that we were being forewarned of. Happily those cuts have not so far seriously affected transport spending. But last week, the same Derby Litchurch Lane Bombardier plant suffered a severe blow when the Department for Transport announced that the order for new trains to work the Thameslink service in London is likely to go to Siemens in Germany. Siemens builds fine trains (although, as …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , and | 10 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • paul barker
    I have seen figures suggesting that Data Centres currently planned would triple UK Electricity consumption, that is not remotely comparable with slowing our con...
  • Nonconformistradical
    Seconded...
  • Big Tall Tim
    Good article Kobe...
  • David Allen
    "the long-hoped-for replacement of (the Conservative Party) as the British Centre Right Party by the Lib Dems" Hoped for by whom, pray? Hoped for by those...
  • cim
    @David Allen Given that we haven't drifted that far out of regulatory alignment we could probably do it in 5-10 rather than 10-20, but that's still a "needs ...