Tag Archives: justice and anti-corruption party

Mark Pack

Mike Hancock wins courts case over paedophile allegation

By Mark Pack | Thu 24th February 2011 - 8:55 am

The BBC reports:

A rival who falsely claimed a Liberal Democrat MP was a paedophile has been convicted of attempting to affect a result in the general election.

Les Cummings, 66, made the false statement about Portsmouth South MP Mike Hancock.

Mr Hancock had strenuously denied the allegations made in an election leaflet pamphlet.

Cummings, who stood for the Justice and Anti-Corruption Party, was fined £500 at Southampton Magistrates’ Court.

He had falsely written on the flyer: “Mike Hancock is a paedophile.”

It then showed a picture of Mr Hancock with children and the words: “Would you let him get this close to your children?”

This …

Continue reading »
Posted in Election law and News | Also tagged , , and | 7 Comments
The Voice

Mike Hancock MP “horrified” by paedophile slur leaflet

By The Voice | Tue 22nd February 2011 - 9:50 pm

The BBC reports from Southampton Magistrates Court:

A Liberal Democrat MP has described allegations he was a paedophile as “absolutely untrue and offensive”.

Mike Hancock told Southampton Magistrates’ Court he was “horrified” by a leaflet published during last year’s general election.

The court heard Les Cummings, who was standing against the MP, had written: “Mike Hancock is a paedophile”.

He denies making a false statement with the purpose of affecting the result of the election in Portsmouth South.

Mr Cummings, 66, from Portsmouth, is accused of publishing the leaflet last April, while he was standing against Mr Hancock as an independent for the Justice

…

Continue reading »
Posted in Election law and News | Also tagged , and | Leave a comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Hywel
    "Only 9% picked a customs union and 7% the single market, the party’s current policy. " Maybe people have a limited understanding of what these are. Hell ...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "I would rather win 80 seats and be third everywhere else than win 30 and second in 100 plus. No points for second place" Seconded...
  • Tim Rogers
    Nick. Time is the essential element here. Only with time will we be able to see if it worked. Voting for us at elections at all levels will require us to unders...
  • Ian Patterson
    It’s all down to the difference between fluffy seats where we can do well in parts of UK and the larger number of non fluffy seats where we do not. As the las...
  • Nick Baird
    Hi Tim - that may be a reasonable assessment of where we are now, but it also confirms the problem. When you talk about "those Conservative voters" that's an ac...