Mike Hancock wins courts case over paedophile allegation

The BBC reports:

A rival who falsely claimed a Liberal Democrat MP was a paedophile has been convicted of attempting to affect a result in the general election.

Les Cummings, 66, made the false statement about Portsmouth South MP Mike Hancock.

Mr Hancock had strenuously denied the allegations made in an election leaflet pamphlet.

Cummings, who stood for the Justice and Anti-Corruption Party, was fined £500 at Southampton Magistrates’ Court.

He had falsely written on the flyer: “Mike Hancock is a paedophile.”

It then showed a picture of Mr Hancock with children and the words: “Would you let him get this close to your children?”

This is the second (and almost certainly final) successful court action under the Representation of the People Act over false allegations in election leaflets distributed for the 2010 general election. The other case was that of Labour MP Phil Woolas, who lost his seat after making false comments about his Liberal Democrat opponent. The most notable previous case was that of Labour councillor Miranda Grell, who lost her council seat after making false allegations about one of her Liberal Democrat opponents being a paedophile.

These three successful cases in just under four years is an unusually high number for a legal provision that has previously gone many years without being used successfully.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.


  • Technically and pedantically “He” didn’t win the case as it wasn’t brought by him.

    Had the gentleman been found not guilty because although the statements were manifestly false he had had a reasonable belief in their truth* I don’t think the headline would have read “Mike Hancock loses court case….” 🙂

    * Given that the story came from his hairdresser it would have been difficult to sustain that!

  • paul barker 24th Feb '11 - 2:11pm

    A ridicously light sentence though, £5,000 & community service would have been more like it.

  • Tony Dawson 24th Feb '11 - 8:17pm

    I too am surprised at the leniency of the sentence. One wonders what would befall Phil Woolas MP should he be brought to court (as he should be, together with his agent Joe FitzPatrick) for his dishonest actions against Elwyn Watkins. After all, calling someone a friend of terrorism must surely rank lower than labelling someone a Paedophile?

    In fact, Mike Hancock is clearly the loser in this case since, in establishing the falsehoods, he has exposed several truths which would not go down well at all amongst his electorate as a whole.

  • It is worth clarifying that as has been said this was a prosecution brought by the police for an offence that they thought had been committed by Mr Cummings and Mike Hancock was called as a witness for the prosecution.

    You have also to ask what you would do if you believed a serious crime had been committed. You would not put it on a leaflet, you would report it to the police. That Mr Cummings did the former and does not seem to have done the latter rather shows up his actions. Unfortunately and tragically, Mr Cummings was abused as a child in children’s home in Portsmouth in the 60s – completely before any current councillors etc. were on the council. And the judge said: “But I believe his campaign for what he describes as justice has turned into a vendetta that has ultimately warped his judgement.”

    Mike Hancock may well be, as he himself as said no saint, and has had extra-marital affairs. But in that, he is probably like 50% plus of the population and probably a higher percentage of MPs. The electorate of Portsmouth South also knew that before 1997 as details of one affair had been in the papers in the early 1990s when he stood for the European Parliament.

    Interestingly there are six vox pops in the Portsmouth News today. All say that his private life is his private life and a matter for him. Four out of six say they think he is a good MP and none say he is a bad MP. A small sample admittedly and I am sure Mike Hancock is not perfect as an MP. But any MP would be pleased to get such a response.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 21st Jan - 12:38pm
    MPs would be absolutely mad to put no deal on a ballot, and the EU will not grant an extension for such a crazy purpose....
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 21st Jan - 12:18pm
    Joseph Bourke, the only somewhat beneficial Brexit resolution is its cancellation, the sooner the better. Consequently, compensating public "investment" might have some payback only in...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 21st Jan - 12:02pm
    Arnold, point taken that public investment cannot of itself resolve the structural damage to the economy that Brexit would involve. But what we are talking...
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 21st Jan - 11:50am
    Peter Martin, the Berlin example supports my viewpoint. Bonn continues to do ok as part of the old "rheinischer Kapitalismus" area, while Berlin continues to...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 21st Jan - 11:36am
    PeterMartin, economic growth athough slowing over the longer term has a relatively consistent trend of a little over 2%. Investment spending and spending on public...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 21st Jan - 11:25am
    @David Beckett You can blame Sir Winston Churchill for that. When the House of Commons was bombed in WW2, it was the Government that he...