Tag Archives: matt frei

As Channel 4 News goes on titillating ‘fishing trip’, Sarah Teather calls them out

I wasn’t too impressed by the timing of Sarah Teather’s announcement — on the eve of the party’s conference — that she wouldn’t be standing as a Lib Dem at the next election. But I was impressed by her performance on Channel 4 News last night.

Invited on to talk about immigration in her first television interview since that news broke, Matt Frei decided instead to search for cheap and easy headlines — does she think Nick Clegg’s a sell-out, is she in touch with Lord Rennard? etc — to her evident frustration.

She deals with it well, though as she’s commented today: “I agreed to do Channel 4 last night hoping for a thoughtful space to articulate some of my views on immigration and public discourse. Sadly Channel 4 were doing the Westminster thing and trying to make everything personal and titillating. But that is Westminster I guess. One of the challenges of trying to make arguments from inside the party political space! But I got to make some points anyway.”

Posted in YouTube | Also tagged , and | 15 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 25th Sep - 1:55am
    @ Nick Baird There are 1.44 million people unemployed all of which are looking for a job and don’t have one. There are about 2.3...
  • User AvatarJoeB 25th Sep - 12:59am
    It is only a decade since we had 8 Mps and 5 London Assembly members in London. The first Mayoral election in 2000 contested by...
  • User AvatarJack Graham 24th Sep - 11:45pm
    Oops, got that back to front. 'As you sow, so shall you reap'
  • User AvatarJack Graham 24th Sep - 11:42pm
    There is not a snowballs chance in hell of getting PR. Since we had one for the AV vote, there would have to be a...
  • User Avatarpaul holmes 24th Sep - 11:14pm
    Very brief opinion poll blips don't count for much. The Alliance in the early 1980's polled at very high levels for rather longer than one...
  • User Avatarpaul holmes 24th Sep - 11:09pm
    Just because a policy is self evidently (to you and me!) needed, does not mean voters will be motivated to vote for it. I think...