Embed from Getty Images
Liberals have long believed that wide property ownership, serving as a bulwark against state tyranny, is essential to the preservation of liberty. However, our pluralism has ensured that we have historically been committed to a diversity of housing models, including social housing. With the need for our party to engage with, and empower, communities who often feel forgotten, and deprived of real power over their lives, Liberal Democrats must offer a clear, distinctive, and liberal approach to social housing. What should this look like?
In recent years, various local authorities have brought their housing stock under their direct control, replacing arms-length management organisations, and other local authorities, including my own, Gateshead Council, are planning to do likewise.
However, both of these models – the ‘partial privatisation’ offered by arms-length management organisations and the (local) statism of in-house control – suffer from the same weakness: they deny tenants meaningful control over the management of their homes. Just as ‘Tenant panels’ and ‘Focus groups’ are not a substitute for participatory democracy, the opportunity to lobby local Councillors, in the hope that they will come to aid of a tenant, ignores the need to decentralise and devolve power to the level at which it should be exercised: with the tenant. Both of the above models exemplify the stale and dull bureaucratic managerialism of much of local government and are premised on a paternalistic ethic that has little, if any, concern with empowering local residents to take ownership of their communities.