Work places are communities too

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home
Watch Live on BBC Parliament

As Liberal Democrats we are committed to the concept of people participating and exercising democratic rights in their communities. But we usually identify communities geographically, in the villages or the wards where we can deliver our Focuses.  During yesterday’s debate on Mutuals, Employee Ownership and Workplace Democracy (F22 in the Conference Agenda) Alan Sherwood reminded us that the workplace is also a significant community for many people. So workplace democracy is a natural extension of community politics.

In moving the motion, which derived from a policy paper, Martin Horwood went further and claimed that not only should Liberal Democrat principles of participation and partnership be put into practice in businesses, but also that employee owned firms are more robust, and therefore better for the economy. He cited John Lewis, a successful company that is owned by its employees, and where all receive the same percentage bonus, as a business  that “has not lost its soul along the way”.

The motion, which was passed overwhelmingly, called for legislation and regulations that would make mutuals, employee-owned and employee-share-owned businesses more viable options. Workers would also have participation rights in all organisations with more than 250 employees, including a right to request an employee share scheme covering at least 5% of shares. It also called for ministerial oversight of this sector.

One speaker pose an interesting question: why is the Co-operative Party not affiliated to the Liberal Democrats?

Andrew Philips spoke of the ethos in large companies today, which he described as one of “total amorality”. Ltd had come to mean limited vision and limited loyalty by the shareholders. In contrast, commitment can be found in the workforce which often has a culture and sense of community, and they must be engaged.

Gordon Lishman reminded conference that 42 years ago he had proposed (successfully) the right to take and use power.  He supported this “transformation, which is ultimate answer to Marxism” and said that it should lie at the centre of our campaigning for the future.

An amendment that called for a right to require (rather than request) a share scheme was rejected.

There is far more detail in the policy paper, and we have to thank Chris Nicholson, who chaired the working group, for helping the party to take this important step forward.

 

 

* Mary Reid is a contributing editor on Lib Dem Voice. She was a councillor in Kingston upon Thames where she is still very active with the local party.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Conference.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Matthew Donnelly 25th Sep '12 - 2:14pm

    It’s fantastic news that this motion has passed. We should be doing all we can to encourage the growth and development of mutuals, co-operatives and social enterprises. There is a growing body of evidence (forgive me, I cannot remember the correct link) that illustrates what a difference employee ownership makes in the workplace, from lower levels of absenteeism to increased levels of collegial egality.

  • Ed Shepherd 25th Sep '12 - 5:07pm

    The option to request purchasing a few shares does not constitute ownership of a company by the workforce when the controlling majority of the shares are owned by corporate investors or the company’s directors. The chance to elect a “representative” who can only speak up at meetings at risk to his/her career and who will be in a small minority compared to the directors of the company does not constitute workplace democracy. I have participated in these kind of employee forums and they are a waste of time that often makes things worse for the employees not better.

  • Matthew Donnelly 25th Sep '12 - 10:16pm

    @Ed Shepherd Caveats do of course apply, but the motion can at least be seen as a step in the right direction…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMartin 12th Jul - 7:32pm
    Robert Brown: What I (tentatively - not living in Scotland) would suggest is that the Party might have a more agnostic stance on independence. The...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 12th Jul - 7:13pm
    Peter Martin, we don't have a high inflation rate now, but we do have a declining exchange rate relative to other developed economies. The reasons...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 12th Jul - 7:08pm
    @ Roger Lake, "it (MMT) resembles what was “Taken for Granted” in the mid-Sixties" Only to a very limited extent. We were on a fixed...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 12th Jul - 6:24pm
    @ JosephB, "It is, however, not simply inflationary pressure that necessitates tax financing. It is the potential for freefall in the exchange rate." You'd only...
  • User AvatarAlan Jelfs 12th Jul - 5:28pm
    An independent Scotland gets the choice of rejoining the EU or not. As part of the UK it doesn't. And rejoining the EU would be...
  • User AvatarAndrew T 12th Jul - 4:31pm
    I think I'll listen to what Scottish Liberal Democrats are saying about independence which is that they do not want it. That said, I think...