A court case and a Birmingham school have thrown the dilemma of clothing choices versus personal interaction requirements into the limelight again. It seems to me that the liberal response to this is fairly clear and quite easy to calculate.
Let’s start with some basic facts:
1. Facial expression is a vital part of communication. Some research puts over 50% of human communication as carried in facial expression.
2. Facial identification is the primary – and in most cases only – form of human identification.
Liberals believe in freedom of expression and religion. But that freedom has limits where it impinges on the ability of others to go about their life (“Your freedom ends where my freedom begins” – sometimes attributed to John Stuart Mill, or Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes). Therefore liberals can construct two positions from the basic facts: