Tag Archives: sarah carr

Subscribe

1. Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
2. Like us on Facebook
3. Subscribe to our feed
4. Sign-up for our daily email digest

Most Read

1. That by-election
2. We are being held hostage by the Tory voters who have lent us their vote
3. Our new MPs: Andrew George, Gideon Amos, Cameron Thomas, Claire Young and Rachel Gilmour
4. Why did the Welsh Liberal Democrats underperform?
5. Starmer goes, and the uncertainty returns…

Search

Op-eds

• The Brexit Referendum – 10 years on (Callum Robertson)
• One year on, and I’m still finding it hard to feel pride (Rebecca Jones)
• Andy Burnham’s housing challenge: Why his own arguments demand more than Labour’s current plans (Iain Donaldson)
• ALDC’s by-election report – 18th June (Joe Nutt)
• Mathew on Monday: Starmer’s resignation and an increasingly ungovernable country (Mathew Hulbert)

• 20C night
• Sammy Going South and the morality of employing child actors
• The Joy of Six 1537
• Lessons from 1936 and 2026 for the Liberal Democrats (LDN#211)
• Leadership plotting, in real life and in fiction
• A journey along the Welsh Border in 1963
• Recipe for a real change of direction
• Day 9304: So Farewell Then, Kier Starmer
• Personality matters in politics: Starmer's lack of one did for him

Recent Comments

• Tristan Ward
  “Let’s start by arguing that the economic benefits of the Single Market far exceed having to accept freedom of movement into the UK, and take it from there....
• Chloe
  'Needless to say the poorest in British society paid the price for this' I remember canvassing , the poorer the area the less interested they were. Membership ...
• GWYN WILLIAMS
  A balanced and fair assessment of the Senedd campaign. Unlike in Scotland, Wales has not as yet polarised into for and against Independence camps. The Welsh Lib...
• Jana
  The logic of this article is that we should be rejoining the Single Market. That is different from signing up to complete political Union by joining the EU. ...
• Pawel Urbanski
  Good piece, Tom. I would just split it into two things 1/ The principle: someone living off their assets should not pay less tax than someone living off a wage...