Tag Archives: sarah ledford

Super Lib Dem Lords on Super Saturday: Sarah Ludford – No progressive politician could vote for this deal

Sarah Ludford is very much in our thoughts at the moment. It’s only three weeks since her husband, Steve Hitchins died. On Saturday she was in her place in the House of Lords pulling apart this appalling Brexit deal. She reminded peers that it was being sold to the Tory right wing as a delayed no deal. She talked about how it would mean more bureaucracy for businesses in Northern Ireland and all of us as we lose things like our pet passports and seamless access to healthcare. She warned of the effect on workers’ rights, saying that no progressive politician could vote for the deal.

My Lords, I am pleased to follow the noble Lord, Lord Reid; I agreed with every word. I found the opening remarks of the noble Baroness, the Leader of the House, somewhat perplexing. She reproached those of us arguing against Brexit for not arguing for a federal Europe. The clue is in the name: “remain”. We just want the status quo, not to expand or change our existing terms of membership.​

I agree with Tony Blair—not something I used to say. He rightly says that the Government are using the,

“sentiment of ‘let’s get it done, let’s get it over with, end the agony’, to sweep away proper scrutiny of what is a profoundly bad deal for our country”.

Tony Blair is right that:

“You don’t take a decision of destiny through a spasm of impatience”.

Boris Johnson had previously damned the division of Northern Ireland and Great Britain through regulatory checks and customs controls down the Irish Sea, declaring that:

“No British Conservative government could or should sign up to any such arrangement”.

Now, he says that this is a fantastic arrangement. It is a looking-glass world. Can the Minister, in winding up, clarify how these arrangements comply with Section 55 of the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018, which makes it unlawful for the Government to enter into arrangements whereby Northern Ireland forms part of a separate customs territory from Great Britain?

It is astonishing that the Chancellor refuses to give us a new economic analysis, but both government and independent figures suggest that every household will be around £2,000 worse off than even under Theresa May’s version—a drop of 6% or 7% in GDP. The weaker Canada -minus trade relationship that this Government envisages, compared with Mrs May’s association agreement, will worsen that prospect. The Home Secretary, Priti Patel, told Radio 4 yesterday that access to the customs union and single market would be good for Northern Ireland’s economic stability and security. Excellent. So why is such access being torn away from England, Scotland and Wales? It would be good for us too. Instead, the Government want to cut the rest of the UK adrift from the continental internal market. This does not honour the heritage of Mrs Thatcher.

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 6 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPatrick 15th Nov - 11:34pm
    @David Allen, what needs to be understood, is that "Brexit Bonus" isn't some extra.money, that UK gains if it doesn't leave EU. It is money,...
  • User AvatarMichael Sammon 15th Nov - 11:05pm
    We shouldn't step aside for anyone. Once we accept this is a good idea then it is inevitable people willing to throw the lib dems...
  • User AvatarRob Heale 15th Nov - 8:59pm
    In response to Richard (above) and others: If you want to go back to previous decades:- 1. Plaid Cymru were historically opposed to the E.U...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 15th Nov - 7:58pm
    Alex Macfie: "Lib Dems standing aside in places like Canterbury would ...result in Lib Dem votes going to the Tories. And it would enable the...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 15th Nov - 7:15pm
    How different our country will look with these new trees, all taking carbon out of the atmosphere, promoting biodiversity and creating new areas for recreational...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 15th Nov - 7:05pm
    When the electorate experiences our way of doing things, it likes what it sees.