Tag Archives: vat

Opinion: Once again, the French show a little bit more imagination…

By Martin Land | Wed 2nd September 2009 - 6:45 pm

The reduction in VAT from 17.5% to 15% quickly condemned and rightly so, by Vince Cable, as expensive and ineffective is one of this government’s more costly errors. The one year only cut will cost us the incredible sum of £12.5 billion pounds and has done little to stimulate consumer spending, simply because despite the enormous cost it still seems so meaningless at the till.

Indeed, it may will come with a sting in the tail, as when it comes to an end and VAT goes back to 17.5% it will come with a sharp inflationary jolt which may well trim back some of those ‘green shoots’ that Labour will being telling us about this winter.

The French, as usual, have shown a little bit more imagination.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 4 Comments
Stephen Tall

Jeremy Browne: VAT cut has helped the richest the most

By Stephen Tall | Wed 8th April 2009 - 11:09 pm

The Lib Dem press release headline is stark: Wasteful VAT cut only benefiting the rich. (It’s also, whisper it gently, not 100% accurate: for ‘only’ read ‘mostly (ish)’).

Here’s what Lib Dem shadow chief financial secretary Jeremy Browne has to say about the party’s research showing that the VAT ‘savings work out at an average of over £9 a week for the richest households, while poorer households are saving less than £3, despite recent claims from Gordon Brown that families would save at least £5 a week’:

The Government’s defence of its wasteful VAT cut continues to unravel. Its benefits

…

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 1 Comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Chris Webb
    Welcome Cody; “wetter than a Dogger Bank trawler” they said, not realising that even by then such craft were rarities. I left once they failed for a second ...
  • Mick Taylor
    Referenda/Referendums?? How typical of LibDems to argue about semantics rather than the substantive point....
  • Mick Taylor
    @Andrew Tampion. As the current UK constitution (unwritten) stands, then yes. You can't have one rule for things you like and another for things you don't like....
  • Andrew Tampion
    "We elect MPs to make decisions for us. If a future government gets elected on a platform to join the EU, then consent would be there. We didn’t need a refere...
  • Jonathan Parry
    This is an interesting article. One Nation Toryism never got going until the demise of the Liberals in the 1920s (Disraeli certainly never practised it). To t...