Tag Archives: virtual parliament

Alistair Carmichael questions government on ending of virtual parliament

If the Government produces guidance it should stick to it, right? After this weekend, that idea seems old-fashioned.

One of the 5 main steps of the UK Government’s guidance on safe working is about helping people to work from home.

3. Help people to work from home

You should take all reasonable steps to help people work from home by:

  • discussing home working arrangements

  • ensuring they have the right equipment, for example remote access to work systems

  • including them in all necessary communications

  • looking after their physical and mental wellbeing

     

For people who are mainly office based, the guidance is clearer:

Objective: That everyone should work from home, unless they cannot work from home.

We have seen over the past few weeks that MPs have been able to work pretty well from their dining rooms, studies and kitchens. Some might say that Parliament has even come across as being a bit more mature and responsible in that time as we’ve not been subjected to the weekly pantomime of Prime Minister’s Questions at full pelt.

But Jacob Rees-Mogg has decided that MPs should all return to Westminster from next week. Unless they live within driving distance of Commons, they will have to take public transport unnecessarily. They will require on-site staffing, not necessarily from their own parliamentary staff, who can continue to work from home, but from House cleaners, security staff and clerks.

Rees-Mogg, a representative of a Government who doesn’t like being held to account at the best of times, argues that Parliament can’t operate effectively if they aren’t all there. How effective a use of people’s time is it going to be to take up to an hour carrying out votes which could be done at the touch of a button? Chris Bryant, in an article in today’s Observer, describes the bizarre procedure:

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 3 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Rif Winfield
    Putting aside all the financial discussions regarding income and wealth redistribution, and the sheer cost of building those 1,500,000 new homes, which issues a...
  • nigel hunter
    I would not be surprised if the 'NEETS' are steered into the construction industries.There are many jobs in the field from labourer to architect. The social sti...
  • Peter Davies
    Dilnot did not propose a tax but a subsidy. That's how he convinced so many people that such an amazingly unfair proposal was acceptable....
  • Ruth Bright
    Agreed - I think people support it because it's there....
  • Tristan Ward
    @Peter Martin and Jana I think I’m with Jana on this one. The real test of a satisfactory level of income/resources should surely be an amount, taking tax...